That happens and is going to happen regardless of its a set in stone rule or not. People will always spin to see something some way or another.
Feedback is directly taken into account, thats precisely how things like the M44 and M55 came about as common additons in the first place, as BVV explained in the video.
Both of the D and F aren’t needed for the US and would defeat the reason for rank IX unlike Britain and Japan they can come in without messing things up
No plans for it on the camo currently.
And the bug report by chance?
Also thanks
Yeah but there’s no harm in them being foldered for the US at the same time. It’s the same model and same equipment only difference would be the camo.
Yes but clear rules/criteria objectively reduce it and, for people like yourselves, provide a very quick (One that could potentially be automated) response to such forum posts resulting in less clogging
Yes and no.
When they are near, if not, fully identical performance wise. I think there should be a system where players can choose which in the folder they can research first
The 18F also wasn’t needed for Britain. Like I don’t care if the 18F does or doesn’t come to the US tree, but using “not needed” is a bit weak when Britain doesn’t need one either.
The 18F is a continuation of the other Australian Hornets @Smin1080p_WT have already said why Britain is getting the 18F
Imo if there isn’t a load out change I think having the two seat option should be a modification with worse performance in exchange for a different look
Yes there is a line. But I prefer you throw all F-18s there as they are blocking my F-14D.
Edit: F/A-18. Big huge emphasis on letter A
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
ahhh, a misunderstanding on my part. It read like they decided not to add the hp for “uhhh reasons” at first
nah, they just held the 2550rpm from the L60 chieftains (bar Mk.3)
2300 is the correct RPM considering Condor 900 is a relative of CV12 i do believe, its like TCE rather than TCA (Chally’s)
and if anything, lower RPM=less Horsepower
Okay. Compromise?
I want certain vehicles to apply to BVVDs statement or at the very least know the rules/criteria so I know what to expect when a vehicle is announced. But you’ve made clear that will likely not be the case.
For stuff that doesn’t apply to BVVDs statement, can we atleast get skins to represent them in the interim to their potential addition? (Officially since console players can’t access WT.Live) with the obvious stipulation they can’t be used in things like Sim.
So…Skin for German/Hungarian ME-210 to represent an RAF-Capture?
Respectfully this cant really be done. Otherwise almost the entirety of the German tree would need a British / Soviet / American / French skin.
Captured vehicles were very much not what BVV was talking about.
No doubt someone will make an RAF captured skin for the Me 210, but we have no plans for this currently.
