They should lower the spawn point cost for the Penguin loadout in GRB. It’s not on the same level of performance as the Mavericks and it should not be 900 spawn points or more.
It doesn’t track ground targets at all but I’ve gotten a few kills on SPAA that sit in spawn, I mainly keep it as a silly missile to decoy.
The F-5A(G)-40 can really use it though. Have a friend ping a SPAA sitting in spawn, mark near the SPAA, fire the missile from 15km or wherever just make sure you have LOS otherwise it won’t hit.
Definitely not effective but it’s silly lol.
I think it should be maybe 100SP for 2x Penguin lol
1 Like
the terrain is looking sweet, Afghanistan will finally be pretty for low-level flight?? Not that there’s time to look but nonetheless
1 Like
No one likes Afghanistan
3 Likes
I tried the 8x GBU-39s and 2x Penguins loadout to bomb the enemy spawn but I realized It was the same SP as the 6x Mavericks loadout and it’s not worth it to run. Please Gaijin notice that the Penguin can’t track tanks, being slower and lower the SP. Or give the Penguin GNSS? Like IRL. (I hope I’m right about this).
1 Like
The Penguin is a gimmick missile, that’s just kinda the role it has. You don’t have to use it
1 Like
It does have GNSS in game I’m pretty sure. As for ground tracking that’s not something it does IRL. Nor does it act like a real Penguin. It acts like a Mav
1 Like
Gaijin extended dev-server because they’re using that time to fix my specific favorite thing surely.
2 Likes
its nice in sim, IDK if there is an RB map
On the stat card it only says IR+IOG.
Yeah you’re right, mayhaps a bug report is in order but idk if it would really help
1 Like
i was wondering if the Gripen E would be getting the aim120D
since the Gripen E is designed to carry any AMRAAM variant
a issue was made here Community Bug Reporting System
just because it has support for it i don’t expect the Gripen e to get it but it would be nice
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Probably not, I think gaijin wanna keep it to try and bring up US aircraft capabilities until we see new aircraft which is fine
makes sense that they would keep it to us aircraft but i do hope
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
7 Likes
Eh I think it’s fine for now, not too bad and okay for the BR. Besides as the 120D currently goes it’s pretty terrible
Falcon radar coming this update, no?
Hello, it has been two years since the report on the inclination error of China’s Type 96 series tanks was approved, but it has not been fixed yet. The hull inclination angles of tanks such as Type 96, Type 96A, and Type 96AP are too large. In this case, the hull of the Type 96B tank, which needs to be purchased, is correct. Does this represent something? Can we get the correct Type 96 tank family in this version?
5 Likes
Have you seen this thread yet? If you want to add a like to it to help bring more attention to these bug reports (and you should open all of the links to the bug reports on this thread and click “I have the same issue” as well.)
2 Likes