With the expanded use of these bombs, it would be cool if the bomb model could be updated to reflect the true appearance of EGBU-24 and further differentiate it from GBU-24, the same way other Enhanced Paveway EGBUs are modelled
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UQsZ9qziEvpw
1 Like
It got worse
The missiles now can just miss on their own because they are spread out much more
any news on the rp and sl requirement reduction for rank 8 and 7 planes?
since a new rank was introduced
3 Likes
Also i think you forgot +10 issues with the jas39e, 12 pylon flares are cool but id like my rwr to be 360°, my maw to be functional, my hmd to be the targos 2 and ill skip over the others issues.
3 Likes
Hell yeah
2 Likes
Dedication to finding information goes a VERY long way. Britain does seem to have one of the most dedicated groups for certain
1 Like
Please give us the option to choose between the old UI for planes in the radar… The contacts in a circle format was much better.
Now those plane icons are so small, i can barely see them, and they overlap so much
Give us a option to choose between the old one and the new one
Also when you hide the missiles (target type filter), if you cycle between targets the TWS will still choose the rockets wtf
3 Likes
6 Likes
Not when it comes to the GBT 155 though
As I outlined there, massively slower RoF then Vickers documents and wayyyyy slower than pretty much all other 7.0/3 SPGs in the game, along with being manually loading so it gets worse as crew get knocked out.
As I point out there
bkan - 3.2 seconds autoloading. br 6.7 (though limited angles to fire, fair)
auf1 - 7.5 autoloading. br 7.0
type 99 - 7.5 autoloading, br 7.3
2S19M2 - 6 seconds autoloading, BR 7.3
2s19M1 - 7.5 seconds autoloading, BR 7.0
GBT 155 - 13 seconds non autoloading stock ready rack, 18 seconds non autoloading (so can be worse as crew die…) BR 7.0
1 Like
They turn the same as the C-5, this will change nothing
This new AIM-120 wont do much more than C-5, you can relax
4 Likes
All Ive heard so far is that the DL remains active even when the seeker goes active , making them harder to notch. The F-15C GE was already scraping the barrel of needing to be 14.7 anyway, if that is the case, and they are harder to defeat, then that gives it a notable advnatage over pretty much everything else and would warrant a BR increase.
I know US mains dislike things being placed at appropriate BRs, but that is how balance works
Be-6 = Qing-6?
from the looks of it, its just a C5 with a higher (or no) gimbal limit. combined with the flight characteristics of the C5, its not hitng any extreme HOBS like the 77-1 or Pl12.
Absolute joke of a savior missle
1 Like
Depends, if the range performance is good enough then the US might finally have a plane thats good at a specific job instead of being held back by some part of it
Thats been a thing for the past 2 years for every single plane and FOX-3 with DL on the radar btw
Again, i am not main[X], its just facts, this missile will bite the dust vs PL-12A, R-77-1, MICA and literally every other missile
Indeed, the only thing new is you can launch it backwards just as MICA or R-77-1, but it wont pull in at close ranges at all
4 Likes
I thought even now the missiles continued to receive updates from the onboard radar even after they went active?
No. Its not, the DL stops when the missile goes active.
Only after its been defeated by chaff or something, you can see on the radar, the DL channel (the circle around the target) stops when the missile goes active.
But usually by the time the DL restarts, its too late for the missile to react and it misses