I feel like your position here is due to a skill issue. It is not hard to bait a bad shot from a T tank with a disabled autoloader when you’ve a disabled horizontal drive, at which point the T tank has lost and you win. It’s not hard.
You realise there’s an armoured plate above the autoloader, right? The crew are not just bolted straight into the autoloader.
Is this B-26 Marauder sources used for the A-26 Invader, or am i stupid?
bro have forgot if ur shoot by side or lower front hull，ur driver/engine and rotator will highly possibly be killed/broken together,i think if its ur skill issue to think RU MBT is such weak?
u metioned a plate over the reloader right?so what connected it with its rotator?is that a structure like basket?
Confusingly A-26B/A-26C were re-designated B-26B/B-26C when the USAAF became the USAF.
JD-1 was the US Navy designation, that definitely gives it away as being about the Invader rather than Marauder
Ah, yeah. It got even more confusing when i searched the source and it produced pilot notes for british Marauder IIs. Cheers!
Any update on the Yak-141 getting its R-73’s? Any chance of the R-77?
If you’ve ended up in that position, that’s your fault. Russian tanks are objectively inferior in game to Western platforms, with the exception of chemical protection. If you can’t grasp this, this is on you.
You know you can look up how they’re fabricated instead of insisting on being wrong and wanting a fictional article modeled? The turret is free of the autoloader. There is a plate above the autoloader, depending on the variant of the loader. Below that plate, assuming the variant facilitates it, is the autoloader. There is no basket to be found on these tanks, and whilst both turret and loader are lifted into place together, they are not directly attached, with the T90 being an exception from my research.
Got to love the addition of introducing a new SPAA for Russia in the BR gap of 12.7 to 12.7
Ok, now for the positive feedback;
I am glad that the Leclercs, Type 10s and Type 90s got more modules and turret baskets! Previously, the Merkavas, Russian and Chinese tanks got them.
At last, the Abrams and Leopards are no longer in an unfairly disadvantageous position.
However, it is unfortunate that no armor fixes have come alongside with the new modules.
The new crew animations on open vehicles are great! They now feel like actual humans and make the vehicles feel more lively.
The graphical improvements are also great, particularly in Naval. The Naval polishments and additions are warmly welcome as well.
Now if only they got the rest of the rubbish missing from them, like oh I don’t know, armour.
Armor? On a non 2A7 NATO tank? Dont be ridiculous /s
This one’s more “Armour on a French tank? Clearly false”
Even AMX 40 no armour. Can’t comment on the Type 10s tho. Know very little of them.
Bro just repeat its on me and russian mbt is weak? why not looking about how many peoples are buying russian preuiem vehicles?the russians’ VII ranked players are over 5 times than any other country,cant u imagine the reason? if its weak why so many people went into it? they are all idiots and noobs and only u the cleverest?
Fluffy_Bucketles
You know you can look up how they’re fabricated instead of insisting on being wrong and wanting a fictional article modeled? The turret is free of the autoloader. There is a plate above the autoloader, depending on the variant of the loader. Below that plate, assuming the variant facilitates it, is the autoloader. There is no basket to be found on these tanks, and whilst both turret and loader are lifted into place together, they are not directly attached, with the T90 being an exception from my research.
if it dont have direct connection,something else drives it right?so that device should be made into a rotator bacause ur crew will be hard to use gun sight if he dont rotate with turret
will this be expanded on the jas39e?
no since the stock missiles are in the belly pylon
also they reused the bugged icon that we have in live server to make the stock missile icon, nice.
No. Stock AMRAAMs on fuselage so won’t be able to use BOLs till you research them
Why would the lowest performing top tier plane need to be at the same BR as the best performing one? If you care about balancing, then that’s not the way to go about it. I know you hate US mains, but logic has to override emotion.
since when are the stock missles at the belly. they were underwing last time i played. like on the jas39c.
Edit since they changed the position of the stock aim 120c to the belly they prevent you from getting bols without researching a rank 3 missle…
Its not though, that would be the J-10C based upon January Data. (if you forget about Israel not even having a top tier jet)
F-15C GE is the second best performing 14.3 just slightly behind Gripen E. heck its barely behind the German AESA Typhoon
If we factor in the normal skill issues of US mains as evidence by the Abrams. I think it would be a perfectly acceptable 14.7 in its current state, let alone with upgraded missiles
Poland mentioned 💪💪💪