no problem
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/tIoiR3QLOs6z
My way older bug report about the same topic with a lot of sources on the issue has been left on read for over a year now… yet this random bug report gets adressed, the fix is also not accurate and its still missing its counterweight for the chaff pod
i hope my report also gets adressed, so it can be fixed properly instead of half
3 Likes
Its horsepower didn’t change, the engine rpm did. It should still schmoove just as good as it did before
Are we able to set a radar mode for aircraft only before launching an aircraft on the new radar interface like the radar selections?
Hey. This was never done on a Hunter F 1. It was tested on a Mk 4. It remained only as a proposal for F 1 and was not adopted for any service Hunters operationally.
1 Like
Still disappointed that no changes to the AH-1Z made it in. It’s still missing its historical JAGM missiles.
Most likely its “40km launch distance against incoming, non evading target” as this is how most “missile ranges” are published for marketing/propaganda needs. Question is how fast this target is approaching and what altitude.
Closest to “info” would be Derby ER brochure for air to air work, stating 100km head on range "launching aircraft and target subsonic, at medium altitude. Its not a lot, but infinitely more accurate info than most missile information stating range: yes.
Hey Smin! Would you be able to comment on wether the I-Derby ER is still WIP or is this its final form?
WIP. None the less, please report anything you suspect to be incorrect.
2 Likes
The ER currently only has 8.5kN more thrust than the SR despite using a much newer and more advanced motor and it falls out of the sky at ~15km
Thanks a lot :D
Huh a three month old bug report for just for fixing number of listed fire directors fixed yet it’s th 2nd Anniversary of the addition of the Ocean Escort USS Dealey DE-1006 which has been plagued with the lack of usable GFCS that are even on the model on the ships superstructure… WHAT ARE THE DEVS PRIORITIES FOR FIRE DIRECTORS!! (sorry one for dramatic flair, yet a humble request this may finally get fixed).
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4KdI4UokjOrx?comment=cPZyADC4asiEDZUhstajEOIr
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Is the battle rating of 14.3 final for the F-16C Block 52? Because if it is, that is a huge mistake. This plane is way worse than a lot of 13.7’s. It has a worse engine, worse flight model, less countermeasures compared to the F-16C Block 50 and F-16I. Can we please get some more info on whats gonna be done with this plane? Are you guys thinking about giving it MAW, 360 Degree RWR or maybe even the triple rack AIM-120’s that are advertised for it.
3 Likes
Newer and advanced yes, but good luck proving it uses powdered unicorns as propellant. Same story as with WPU-16B motor used in AMRAAMs C5 onward.
No BTR-3 for Russia, I assume, because of Ukraine war?
Unfortunately, so far this has not been proven to exist outside of renders.
We welcome any additional information on them however.
2 Likes
How about fixing known faults then such as the Gripen E’s missing Chaff slaving to the MAWS? Which functions on all other platforms that should maintain this functionality. Especially given it is one of the most advanced defensive suites on the planet and should be able to discriminate threat types.
1 Like
I wonder how can almost all NATO mbts get lift basket but chinese and soviets’ mbt never get these?(except VT5)
Leclerc and Type10 now get lift basket,why dont you add lift basket to T-80s/T-72s/T-90s?
Hey Smin, is the J15T’s engine complete, or is it still under development?
1 Like