Ik it was never made, planned, etc my point is that if an imaginary missile which only had a mockup is in game when mock up vehicles are not allowed, why not give it a gimped mmw guidance so its balanced and nato has a counterpart to the Kh-38mt which was never built and the only “proof” of its existence is a mock up, not even a functional missile at an arms expo.
@Smin1080p_WT With LJDAM being added to more aircraft will we see them also added to the A-10C too as it should also carry them?
And also will LJDAM-ER also be coming to the aircraft that are getting LJDAM this update and the A-10C too?
1 Like
So anything goes for the russians with the KH-38, an armament that got a post with thousands of responses searching for a real source on the IR version, all they were able to find was the image that was shared earlier, no video being used, no reliable source, and yet it’s still in the game.
But god forbid for the rest of the nations to get something that even comes close to it
In no way did i say that the agm 84 will be gamebreaking. My whole point was to talk about the lack of fnf weapons for the afformentioned countries. Since gaijin seems to think that the us tree is lacking in that category, and therefore needs to add a better missle.
Its still under consideration. However best to report any others that dont yet hage it, and we can pass it to the devs for review.
Yup, gaijin has its own “sources” which they dont disclose so you cant disprove them. The only way that you could disprove it is if u got russian military to say, we never built it, and even then gaijin gets to choose if they believe it or not.
1 Like
And if that wasn’t enough, this update includes a new SPAA with one of the fastest and better turning missile, but poor little russians players.
What a joke of balance
As i said in my previous comment, the faster 95Ya6 would still be bearable, wouldnt be fun or anything but i have an issue with the pantsir being able to have 48 missiles at once (96 w ammo box) and just be able to completely deny any ground strikes of the enemy team especially as no other nation is anywhere close to being able to do that.
Complaining Russia is getting mig 29m is so dumb.
Everyone been asking for a modern mig -29 for years and years
4 Likes
This is so sad. They should add the MiG-29M 9.41, Mig-35 and MiG-29K.
(People will still find a way to complain about them)
4 Likes
If it outperforms the Mavericks Depends on if we get a GPS enabled version that can LOAL, as they have a high subsonic cruise phase (Mach .86, average speed to maximum range (66Nmi, 122km ) is ~ Mach .82) so will beat the Mavericks to a Target past about 15km or so, outside their seeker’s range. Since we’ve only got data for the WGU-10(of which all EO/IIR A2G ordnance is based loosely off), and no use for datalinks for Post release point of aim corrections I’ve got no hope of this improving.
Also the warhead is only 215lb (97kg) of explosives (Destex) so it’s slightly more than a Mk.82 500lb bomb, so expect a similar effect.
1 Like
There should be more MiG-29 series aircraft.
Will the F16 Block 52 receive it’s appropriate upgraded HMD? Currently on the DEV server it’s a copy paste from the F16C Blk.50, in reality it should have either a feature-full Thales Scorpion or the JHMCS II.
1 Like
Funny the Finnish Sturmi (Stug-III with improved mantlet and side armour) Wasnt added when finland was added when the Stug III was a fav tank of the finnish armed forces in ww2
Here’s a report for LJDAM for the A-10C
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2PAB3zE28vaE
1 Like
How is it that the Soviets could utilize the Kh-38MT, yet we are restricted from using the AGM-154C, AGM-158, Taurus, and Storm Shadow?
Several of these weapon types existed long before the Kh-38 was even developed.
1 Like
Funny thing, there is no proof of Kh-38MT ever being built.
Maybe if someone makes a bug report about it
Is there a list yet of any unlisted additions in this update? Also the S-61 German coastal boat got added today.
1 Like
Hey uuuuh. Could you consider adding this big mama jama back please?
5 Likes