I mentioned it earlier, but the AS37 is not the actual AS37 that was used by the French and British. What they have labeled as “AS37” is the ARMAT, the French-only successor to the AS37 and is incorrectly labeled in-game as the “AS37 ARMAT” when it should just be “ARMAT”.
Giving the ARMAT to Britain makes little sense when Britain never used the ARMAT, nor do we have earlier ARMs. As for the whole BR thing, really does seem a lil inconsistent atm.
Is something wrong with my dev server client, it just keeps saying connecting to server. help
are you using web login?
IF so try to enter the details (Email, password) manually
I did, after 20 minutes of waiting I got a error and got kicked back to login screen. Weird, is it possible that a dev launcher is outdated?
yeah it is, that another reason to do not make bug repport.
And having not a bug for bugged things do not encourage players to make bug repports. And also, there are nothing to really say thanks to a player … We pay the game, and we have to make bug repports without counterpart … We are not employees :D
Will post this here too
If a magazine blows up the crew are on damage control, you don’t start moving shells ones that are automatically loaded due to the enormous weight. It’s a questionable change
I think nations should retain some originality at top tier if it can be helped or avoided. This would be, what, the second tree to get an Abrams outside of the US tree? The issue is that the Leopard 2 and T-80 have been copy and pasted everywhere so its not much of a point but more so just my opinion.
Then it just becomes a matter of time until the T-90 comes to the US, the Challenger goes to Japan, the Bradley is in Russia, and no tree is unique. Its bad enough that you see the Taiwanese Abrams as an enemy against the US in Top Tier sim.
but then how would australians or taiwanese people feel not having there vehicle represented in the tree they want there vehicles to be represented in? theres never gonna be originallity in a nation other than britain because we didnt sell challengers to anyone except OMAN which would go to the uk anyway
Come on man you should know this by now, gaijin will throw up if they have to give something half decent to France.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/h4xEZ84Z4qHl
I haven’t seen my Kugel armor bug report as part of any changelog. Will it be included in the major update as part of a major fix, and the report has already been marked as fixed, but on the live server, it can still be damaged by small HE shells from planes.
This feature should definitely be made optional, because otherwise it will lead to a lot of unpleasant situations where your ship could have continued sailing for another half of the battle, but sank due to another explosion of ammunition that should have been used up, all because of this stupid feature.
and why did ALL the shells from the second tower hit the first tower, when they should have been distributed equally?
Sead doesnt need the fastest chonkiest missile around. Dead is better in this context
Why couldn’t the Taiwanese Abrams go to the US much like the AIM did? As either a premium or Squadron Vehicle? Why does it need to go to another nation? Especially when that nation has plenty of domestically produced vehicles?
Should the US get a few Mig-29s and Su-27s since they bought like 20 or so from Moldova and friends or can we just keep tech trees as original as possible when permited?
because taiwan both ingame and irl are part of china or more specifically the republic or china.
as for the aim it went to america years ago and its now going to britain because australias part of the british commonwealth and has very close ties with the uk so much so australia considered the queen of england the queen of australia
thats not how it works.
But that is how it works. Leopards are in other trees because they were purchased by the sub-tree nations. Hungry purchased Pumas from Germany. Beligum bought Leopards from Germany. Poland bought everything from everyone. If that is the logic bus we want to ride for giving out domestic vehicles to other nations, then we should make sure it hits every stop, not just the ones we choose. I would agree the case is different regarding captured vehicles but rightfully purchased is already a precedent in-game.
theres a big difference between captured vehicles and vehicles bought legally on an agreement with another nation
Do US mains want more of the same tank?