The Dev Server is Opening with Major Update “Eagle’s Shadow”! — 30.10.2026

Dev Server "Eagle's Shadow" Dev Server Changelog
108

{EC81F44A-D52A-4DF5-AF9F-37BA75253308}
{EC81F44A-D52A-4DF5-AF9F-37BA75253308}1388×1004 304 KB

so, can somebody tell me why is a frigate in a bluewater tree now?
are we not allowed to have new coastal boats now?

4 Likes
109

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

2 Likes
110

any plans for more rank 4 and 5 SPAA for france or britain? they have some massive gaps in this regard, specially for their 7.0-to-8.0 lineups.

111

Well, there goes much excitement as usual for ship placement by these poxy devs & easy cloning of existing equipment…

112

Hi, @Smin1080p_WT , there are changes to the kinematics of R-60 and R-73 families of missiles that are not mentioned in the notes

1 Like
113

So the su-25sm3 goes up from 10.7 to 11.7 in AIR battles because of kh-38’s?? why… please only make it go up in ground BR.

114

1 Like
115

That’s just dev server things?

116

no

1 Like
117

No, their files were changed and now they flight differently. Not just the usual of missiles flying better in test flight

1 Like
118

a man in a military uniform is talking on a telephone with the words ooooh that 's a bingo written below|833x624.75

119

WAIT. Do me/us a favour: R-27ET. Send to dc

120

no changes there

1 Like
121

For now…

122

and its a paper one too lol

1 Like
123

“H-39” isn’t a real name, the “-39” is just a historian-created suffix to specify the 1939 version of the design for the battleship named H. Just “H”, that’s her full name.

The correct full stat card name should be:

H-class, H, project

(Her sister, I, was also laid down and could be a future addition)

 

On a related note, submarines absolutely need proper names before being added. Seeing “Type VII” in the dev stream looks very silly when every other vessel has a proper name instead of the class generically.

Also, German sub designations also should NOT have a dash, despite how common this is in English. So, say, U 505. Same applies to surface ships; all the destroyers we already have should have a space (Z 32, etc) because it’s… the same naming system. (Just like how it’s Bf 109, not “Bf-109” or “Bf109”).

(Japanese subs also don’t use a dash, so I400, Ro500, etc)

 

WT really needs to do better with designation consistency.

2 Likes
124

The EAPU is already on the visual model in game.

125

which danae are we getting? the frigate or the destroyer?

126

as compensation could we get a reload reduction?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FGRPzxUVcn7Y

Or corrections for their engines?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/kBDyXv4H7817

Mk.10 going up to 852 horsepower would be great

4 Likes
127

It should say it’s a premium. got my hopes up it was in the TT

Same here.

And here.