Yes, I know there was some upgrade packages for it that updated the radar and stuff but the issue with those is that (off the top of my head) they add AMRAAM capability… which is not exactly fitting of where I envision it to be lol
So real actually I just like imagining they might future plan for decompression that may or may not happen
I remember the AIM-9L being much more flare resistant in the past (you had to cut afterburner and flare) and then at some point it was nerfed so it became flare hungry, no cutting of AB necessary for most aircraft.
Is there a historical basis for this, or just gameplay?
The USN’s F-5Ns are being upgraded to similar standards as Tactical Air Support’s F-5ATs, same with the Marine Corps’. They just don’t need those additional Sidewinders underwing, since radar/IRST is more of the threat that needs to be replicated
Just gameplay, IIRC all US missiles that have solid state electronics should be extremely hard, if not impossible, to flare off if you stay on the afterburner from rear aspect.
Sweden is an additional producer of the Mk36 motors and the AMRAAM motors and since the propellant sections are interchangeable (Mk36 mods, not Mk36 and AMRAAM) during maintenance they simply stopped producing the high smoke motors after some time.
The AIM-9M Sidewinder missile can be fitted with the following rocket motors: Mk 36 Mod 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11; Mod 9 and 11 motors are filled with a reduced smoke propellant (X-61).
Is that report internally still there? I remember hitting a brick wall with swedish side of sources and not being able to identify anything other then missiles coming from diehl
Additionally, the fitment of the Mod 7 through 11 motor on the AIM-9M indicates as I said that the motors are swappable. Any AIM-9L variant can use any motor combination. The only issue is that there are a few specific reduced smoke motors which vary mostly in what pylons can mount the motor casing. Mod 9 and 11 otherwise are the same.
Sweden only produces reduced smoke propellant it would be inappropriate to assume the RB-74(M) uses the older modifications of the propellant still unless they have not reached their shelf life yet. On that same note, I think I saw a picture of a Harrier being loaded with an AIM-120B in 2022 which was thought to be beyond the shelf life of those missiles.
Yes but it was shown the motors can be swapped. They have no mounting or usage differences in regards to how the missile is assembled. The only changes between mods are the propellant type and the modifications to the hanger for use on specific pylons.
If Gaijin can give Su-27SM the dual R-77 pylons that it could never carry irl they can certainly give all AIM-9 w/ IRCCM a reduced smoke motor.
The 9L/i-1 should have its smokeless motor removed per historical accuracy, but gaijin should be consistent with said nerf hammer, and they most definitly are not at the moment, nor have they ever really been tbh.