The AIM-54 Phoenix missile - Technology, History and Performance

They have near identical control schemes, fin layout, size, and weight, but with only minor differences. It is clear the MIM-23 as a SAM is more likely optimized for low altitude use and the AIM-54 was originally intended for use against high and fast targets.

Whilst the AIM-54 was modified and could subsequently be used with great success against a low alt and low RCS target such as a cruise missile, those targets are not particularly evasive.

That being said, we know for a fact that the AIM-54 can do 25G’s in certain scenarios. Who is to say the missile designed for low altitude and evasive targets shouldn’t pull just as much provided the structural limitation of its’ cheaply made fins are no longer an obstacle?

By any chance do you know if the f14D might be added next update or is in the works?

Dude even if he did know (he doesn’t hes just a suggestions mod) he wouldn’t be allowed to tell you

Never hurts to ask


Capturar
What about the rocket engine of aim-54C to War Thunder?
i have seen a book that says the radar on aim54 has a greater range to activate the seeker.
epdf.pub_shock-impact-and-explosion-structural-analysis-and-design

2 Likes

Huh I thought the f14 didn’t carry 4 missile in the middle and only 3 🤔🧐😐

Can the aim 54 switch between semi active and active radar homing modes while in flight? I don’t mean datalink when I’m talking about semi active mode. Irl

not really, but it kind of does one until the other. or should remain in SARH only for the most part

Do you know if the 120 does? Just found info that the r-77-1 seeker might be able to do that and was wondering if other fox 3s can too.

1 Like

The AAM-4 can, somewhat. I don’t know if it’s a full SARH mode, but it can compare doppler signatures from the host plane bouncing off the target to be better at detecting targets against clutter.

2 Likes

Yes. The Aim-54s start off in SARH until they go pitbull. In real life, the A model needed to reach pitbull range to exit SARH mode and enter ARH mode. The Aim-54B and C did not have this issue and went into ARH mode on their own.

If you’re asking if they could switch back and forth inflight, not really unless the missile loses lock on the original target and the next target on the F-14s radar is hard locked and outside of the pitbull range. But even that probably isn’t possible.

image
Improved motor for the C

5 Likes

image
dogfight capabilities

https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/histories/naval-aviation/Naval%20Aviation%20News/1980/pdf/nd84.pdf

image

Mach 5 for the AIM-54C instead of Mach 4.3

image
100 NM = 185 Km instead of 150 km

https://weaponsystems.net/system/219-AIM-54+Phoenix

AIM-54C top speed : Mach 5

https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=1066
Speeds of up to Mach 5 again
107 NM or 200 km range

https://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-54.html
Mach 4.3 and Mach 5 speeds

2 Likes

none of these are new info and most isn’t accurate

1 Like

image
Shaquille O Neal Shaq GIF - Shaquille O Neal Shaq Remove Glasses - Discover & Share GIFs

1 Like

Come with better public ones and what not

1 Like

image
Shiver me timbers

2 Likes

forecast international has been wrong on so many things over the years that Gaijin refuses to use them as a source for anything. Their real sponsor is JANES.

All relevant sources have already been forwarded and reports have been made on all of the stuff you’ve discussed. In lieu of overwhelming amount of evidence Gaijin has made almost zero changes to the Phoenix and likely won’t.

and no duel plane still

that seem like a pretty absurd take, aim47 is clearly based of the aim4/26 both are american missiles.

iris t and aam 5 are completely unrelated missiles developed by different countries

1 Like