The AIM-54 Phoenix missile - Technology, History and Performance

image
Improved motor for the C

5 Likes

image
dogfight capabilities

https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/histories/naval-aviation/Naval%20Aviation%20News/1980/pdf/nd84.pdf

image

Mach 5 for the AIM-54C instead of Mach 4.3

image
100 NM = 185 Km instead of 150 km

https://weaponsystems.net/system/219-AIM-54+Phoenix

AIM-54C top speed : Mach 5

https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=1066
Speeds of up to Mach 5 again
107 NM or 200 km range

https://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-54.html
Mach 4.3 and Mach 5 speeds

2 Likes

none of these are new info and most isn’t accurate

1 Like

image
Shaquille O Neal Shaq GIF - Shaquille O Neal Shaq Remove Glasses - Discover & Share GIFs

1 Like

Come with better public ones and what not

1 Like

image
Shiver me timbers

2 Likes

forecast international has been wrong on so many things over the years that Gaijin refuses to use them as a source for anything. Their real sponsor is JANES.

All relevant sources have already been forwarded and reports have been made on all of the stuff you’ve discussed. In lieu of overwhelming amount of evidence Gaijin has made almost zero changes to the Phoenix and likely won’t.

and no duel plane still

that seem like a pretty absurd take, aim47 is clearly based of the aim4/26 both are american missiles.

iris t and aam 5 are completely unrelated missiles developed by different countries

1 Like

Calling it now
a2t2q0

9 Likes

Quotes from F-14A Tomcat RIO:

“Sorry for the delay in responding. Although I never fired the AIM-54 in an exercise (I did launch them in a normal mode) it did have an ACM mode that gave it an active launch and higher maneuverability. So in effect it was like an AMRAAM.”

"Again we were at Top Gun over the desert doing gun defense maneuvers. When we got back to base and they checked the G meter it was pegged at 11.0. My pilot, Sluggo, complained of a bad back for a few days. They had to fly a new plane out from Oceana for us in Miramar. "

https://www.reddit.com/r/hoggit/comments/6w6nmo/comment/dma25vj/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

6 Likes

Can yall imagine if we had the biblically accurate Phoenix ingame?

  • Notch tracking perfectly (even with CMs)
  • Great Acceleration
  • High G maneuverability
  • ACM mode
7 Likes

The DCS missile is not well modeled.

1 Like

I abused the hell of F-14B and AIM-54A MK.60 when it was unnotchable/unchaffable and could fly Mach 4 at sea level in multiplayer. It was always fun to fire at 15 NM using horizontal ACM and then watch the missile (via F6) fly and manouver.

1 Like

54s in DCS is aren’t that hard for nothing.

I mostly play F-14A in GS server but missed lot of shots.

Also, I really hate Jester.

dcs planes cant pull 13-15g

2 Likes
  • looks at the G paddle detent on my F/A-18C

Sustained no, but you can 100% peak at like 12 to 14 in DCS, you just risk causing your wings to implode.

not with normal FCS modes.

Depends on the aircraft just like WT, the 16C is still governed and in WT it cant jack it’s G loading in either title, stuff without FBW, F-14s, F-4s, the Mig-21, and others can all peak at far higher G loading just by ramming the stick back at certain airspeeds, the F-14 in particular used to be able to turn hard enough to cause your engines to implode and break all the instruments in the cockpit, but now the wings fail before such is achievable.

Wouldn’t really matter for the Phoenix in WT unless it’s sustained for a long time. Which isn’t possible.