This is the type of video where it isn’t chopped to pieces.
https://youtube.com/shorts/JNAxqc_Bk6M?si=_utV4feMAwOt4ffS
1 Like
I think common sense left the room. And ALL I SEE IS DIRT EVERYWHERE WHERE’S THE TARGET
1 Like
And that negates the targets being hit in the vid?
1 Like
It negates said video as a proof.
You can film the terminators firing at target from afar, not showing what they fire at or what their accuracy is.
Then you make another video filming the impacts on the target, but fired from much closer distance.
Then you edit those two together.
2 Likes
Dust cloud #1, hill untouched, dust cloud #2. How does this show accuracy?
By that logic, Rostec Thales Rheinmetall etc footages are all fake? Just because they obviously use cuts in their videos?
Am I being trolled or something
Without even knowing how far away, how many shots landed in the same place, how long the gun was firing, and you think this video showcases how accurate the BMPT it, this might be you
1 Like
marketing material in form of promotional videos can hardly prove anything in relation to weapon system accuracy if the footage is cut to pieces where you dont see how far the vehicle was from target at the time of firing.
that holds true to literally any arms company, western ones are no exemption from that.
Russian ministry of defense footage, on this one you can also see that the spread isn’t bad. The bus is on the second picture, not that close.
Far enough that you cant see the mounds the BMPTs are shooting at.
You can clearly see the cadence of the hits on the footage.
again
You can see all of this in the videos literally. The distance, where the shots land, and the rate of fire.
Do you unironically call that an accurate assesment of distance of the target?
Why on earth would they be shooting 2 meters away from a target while the generals and the president are carefully observing the equipment they’ve spent so much money on? You can clearly see on the footage that the targets aren’t even close…
And again it wasn’t a “closed doors” staged demo, it was a large scale military exercise (from which this footage is only 1% of it).
And even the Russian ministry of defense footage proves it has a good accuracy at distances.
I gotta ask - how would you feel if you haven’t eaten the breakfast this morning?
No one said they were firing 2m away from the target. But you dont even know from where “the president and the generals” were observing the excercise from, or if they couldnt even see the impact zone. You dont even know if they saw any video at all or if this is the same video that was shown to them.
All you have is video cut to hell and back and you cling to it with your own dear life because why would anyone, let alone goverment, fake a video right?
So we’re going back to the question of: are Rheinmetall, Rostec, Thales etc faking their footage because of they’re also using cuts?
But look at the Russian footage too, you can see that the BMPT’s fire is relatively concentrated.
I am just gonna leave these here
1 Like
barrel waddles like a duck even when it’s firing 1 cannon