Yes!!! Please! Would make awesome BP or event
But if this is added, the real question is, will it get tank or naval decorations 😂
BTW I found some documents that might be useful for you
4 Likes
Thanks so much! That last document had the specifications table that I needed for confirmation.
The 105mm variant as well please?
That’s quite interesting. As far as I know, many amphibious vehicles of today still lack 3-plane stabilizer. Makes me wonder how poor their accuracy is on water.
2 Likes
What the sh*t?
+1
Yep, will probably do the T87 soon, once I’ve finished gathering information (most books talk about the T86/T87 together, which makes my life a lot easier).
2 Likes
+1, would make a great premium/event/BP vehicle!
An appropriately wacky event/BP vehicle
I have some docs from a person that visits the US National Archives. I need to go through the images and do some cropping, flattening, etc. then convert them to pdf, and I can send you a copy.
4 Likes
I’d prefer it as squadron since USA has no low tier squadrons.
No one does, the lowest BR squadron tank is 8.3 (the American M901)
exactly. It’d be nice for a low tier squadron vehicle.
major necropost but your dream may well be true wink wink
3 Likes
13 Likes
Rumour has it that it’s going to be for the upcoming D-Day event. If so, this is going to beat the AH-56 to becoming my first implemented vehicle! Quite surprising, but very happy to see either one come soon.
Edit: yep, it’s confirmed now.
1 Like
To-ku when ?
8 Likes
Hold up, point d) says the stabilizer is “somewhat rougher on the gunner ashore than on the standard M18”
Doesn’t this imply a stabilized M18, something I thought didn’t exist?
2 Likes
I think it’s just referring to how this new stabilizer is rougher than the lack thereof on the original M18, perhaps because it compensates/overcorrects too much or something as it was designed to handle waves.
hey
yeah you’re probably right