I mean the BN compared to the Leo 2A7, not that the 2A7 is bad
I wonder what maximum vertical angles it will operate at. Might be good CAS atgm protection.
Wait so is the B3A getting an armor package upgrade like the normal B3 or something else because the model in the devblog is different from the one that was on the last DEV.
Since the first ‘Leviathans’ Major update trailer and DevStream it wasn’t shown with any additional side protection except by the stock explosive reactive armor plates:
Speaking of aps, when will you finally fix the trophy aps? The bug has been accepted more than 6 months ago and you still havent done anything. Thanks for making the entire point of the mk4m useless
1 Like
Kinda funny when the advertised pack one is the much better tank than the one in the dev blog
-10° to +40° as from the dev server, potentially subject to change
1 Like
T-72 is much prettier than T-90M, so now you can have much better looking vehicle.
But with less side protection, so seems not better for me…
The whole point is to do that, thats why it has 40* elevation
What to do?
At the cost of actual armor, optics and functionality?
Nah, i skip.
pointless tank
12.0?? C’mon man … T90m with arena-m aps would be more suited for this position
Basically this.
The T-72B3 is already pretty much ignored, with the T80U being the superior choice, so why would one with APS (and no armour upgrade), at a higher BR be anything worth playing??
It should be 11.7 foldered with the B3.
3 Likes
That would be nice but lets be real the snail wants us to grind out another 400k RP.
It isn’t foldered with the t-72b3?
Nope
Source?