I’m not really sure tbh. Idk enough about the VT4-series or its compatriots.
Yeah, fair enough. Still, would be suck to stuck with just existing stuff without a promise of something new
As I know, the VT-4-A1 is the best configuration that has been shown,
another VT-4 that was not publicly shown with the FY-2 on the side, the specifics of which are unknown.
Made an edit to the post, specified the name is also known as the T-72B3A.
Maybe someone can answer this, why can’t an older version of the same gun fire the newest rounds? Is it a pressure/breech thing similar to higher grain count ammo found in small arms? Or is it that the rounds while having the same diameter have longer breeches for the shells?
Couple different factors. Mainly the older autoloader itself isn’t designed for long-rod ammunition and to lesser effect the newer guns have modified breech assemblies. The barrels can also take excess pressures greater than the old ones. The 2A46M-4 and 2A46M-5 can fire the newest munitions because of these factors and a few others.
I said yes cause it looks cool
Updated information on the APS and added the fact the vehicle does have cage armor around the engine compartment in a few photos. The T-72B3A has a 270-degree coverage arc unlike the T-90M which has a 360-degree coverage arc. This is due to the placement of transmitter/receivers for the system. It is worth noting that the T-90M and T-72B3A do use the exact same equipment.
- Arena-M T09-A6-1 Active Protection System
- Reaction time: 0.05 seconds
- Coverage: 270-degrees
- 90-degree gap of coverage on rear part of turret.
- Operation:
- Continuously Radiating, Autonomous
- System sounds alarm upon deployment of countermeasures to alert nearby exposed personnel.
- Max Range: 50m
- Types of Targets:
- Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGM)
- Anti-Tank Grenades
- First Person View (FPV) Suicide Drones
- HEAT-shaped Munitions
- Speed of Target Max Intercept: 1,000m/s
- Inventory: 12x Counter-Munitions (6x/side)
- RADAR Type: Pulse Doppler-type
- 6x Transmitters
- 6x Receivers
- Equipment:
- The active protection complex includes a hardware module, transmitting modules, receiving modules, temperature sensors, silos, protective ammunition, a control panel, and a set of cables.
Based on what I found which also applies to the T-90M w/ Arena-M as well with the exception of the system coverage.
Edit: Unofficial reports indicate this vehicle may be entering production in the near term.
+1 for this and for the T-90M with the same system, we need more APS vehicles in-game.
What purpose does this image serve?
oops my bad thought it showed the t-90m with arena, clearly didn’t even check it
this would be a great event/battle pass vehicle
Nah, tech tree
This is likely going to be the new standard for the T-72B3. Whether it keeps the T-72B3A designation or gets something different, this and the T-90M are expected to receive the APS based on patent and sources. Having it as an event vehicle when the Russian tree doesn’t even have an APS vehicle in the research tree beyond the T-55AD-1 doesn’t make sense.
+1, folder with T-72B3?
Also with the addition of 3BM59.
First, the tank would have to be at top tier, not 11,3 or 11.7 after br decompression. SO you’re looking at 12,0. Second the usa and france have been using out dated rounds forever and you want russia with some of the best armor in the game to have a better round??
When America can pen your k5, and France gets something besides dm43 at top tier. we can talk
3BM60 also entered service in 2016.
3BM59 wouldn’t even have much more penetration, it would barely get it over the 600mm mark.
which would affect the pen, It would be more resistant to era and composite. Also prove if it was in service, so far from what ive seen its a prototype.
Why do I need to prove anything? The image you posted says it entered service. Soviet tanks with the exception of an event vehicle still have a round that sits at 580mm of penetration, and yes other nations also need ammo buffs, not just U.S. and German vehicles.