Not that K-5 is better than Monolith but this one seems to have (picture) ERA that’s is the same we have in-game for T-80U (on the side) and some unknown on the front and above the fenders (just like T-90M).
I also watched Red’s video on the subject. I doubt that it will roll into a drone infested battlefield like that, it’s as vulnerable as any tank to this threat. If it somehow does see combat as it is, I expect extreme field modifications.
Science Fiction
Just google statements about Armate from Putin himself or Sergey Chemezov, Head of Rostec
Should rename this to “T-14 Armata with 2A83” LP-83 was meant specifically for the 292. Also as far as I’m aware, the vehicle doesn’t exist yet, closest thing we’ll likely see is the Object 195.
T-14 Armata as a propaganda machine would be a shame begin destroyed in battlefield without any integrated drone jammer/advanced protection.
I may be confusing with something else but I’ve heard about these statement, but not from their president. But I don’t think is that Sci-fi think you said:
Recently the KNDS Unmanned Turret Leopard 2 was showcased:
And people be: “Wow!” about this prototype,
Also, more than a year, the KF-51:
And I don’t see anyone doubting about this machine,
And about Abrams X?
Like c’mon, when the subject is T-14 Armata people comes and say “Uhh, it’s not done yet.” about something that was officially shown almost 10 years ago, and I agree, but not on the way these kind of people (not stating that you’re) say, the war keeps evolving and a country in active war will be always improving their tools.
No, it simply uses them, the powerpack is still of same found of T-14.
We already know that can rotate on spot, and most likely has reverse same as forward.
This is one of 2A82 gun’s modification, this being without bore extractor as thats useless for a crewless turret.
2A82 also boosts bigger pressure
T-14 armata seems like a proper funcional tanks the issue is that it went over budget during developement and mass production of it seems hard, i have no doubts on the leopard 2 ARC 3.0 because There are patents online and the turret has been shown before with a different look
I doubt Armatas will be ever adopted into full service and production. As far as I understand aviable statements and articles, the whole project is either frozen or even cancelled. They will continue to roll over the Red Square at certain holidays, but thats it.
Actually frozen due to the conflict,
I may be wrong but Uralvagonzavod announced that T-14 Armata production lines will be converted in T-90s and probably T-80s,
I don’t know about anything with Uralvagonzavod and T-80 MBT.
Lol i don’t get the info off of there i try to find legitimate info. Plus Wikipedia is for Noobs
So apparently the 152 mm Cannon is a prototype of the 125 mm cannon?
152mm cannon on T-14 Armata:
Танк Т-14 Армата: характеристики боевого танка, сколько на вооружении в России.
https://dzen.ru/a/ZErEHkWBmGv0xE5A
I don’t think so, it just wasn’t accepted in fully service, not a thing that’s common between tanks, it’s something fully functional but never used is large scale.
No.
If 115MM was developed of 100MM, same with 125MM being developed from 115 MM, the 152MM gun was not developed of it.
152MM guns capable of firing APDSFS predate 2A26/46/82/66.
Object 120 had the gun in like 1958.
issue with the 152 mm cannon is how they will fit an autoloader in the T-14, it needs a whole new turret and a new ammo carousel, also 2A83 its pretty darn heavy + it would need a bigger turret to fit the bigger gun, 2A82 its still a 125 mm but with higher pressure
So equivalent to KF51 and Thumper.
tbf Abrams X its a tech demonstrator so its working just that probably it dosent have any armor and only has systems mounted so they can see all the new tech
also KF51 its completely functional too its not that hard specially since rheinmetall already has an autoloader patent and everything else was ready from beforehand
Yes.
I agree with you.
Hi,
T-14 is not supposed to have a cannon from obj.292 but from obj.260 (T-95 Black Eagle)
The problem with Amrat was never that it exceeded the development budget or that they didn’t have the technology, it was a lot of things connected to each other.
The real reasons for the incomplete implementation of Armata:
1, Engine arranged in X (the engine had serious mechanical problems which apparently managed to be solved)
2, the Armata was never planned to enter service with a 125mm gun but with a 152mm gun
3, Problematic stabilization of the 152mm gun
4, There were two factions in the Russian government that were unable to agree, one was for the Armata the other for the T90 M