Swap J-16 and J-15T

I think Gaijin should swap the positions of the J-16 and the J-15T, and create a ‘Naval’ line with JH-7 > JH-7A2 > J-15/T > J-31/J-35. The Sukhoi line should be placed on the far right, with J-11/A > J-11B > J-16

Gaijin Should swap their position?

  • Yes
  • No, why?
0 voters

image

What they should swap is their BR placement to 14.3

3 Likes

J-15T at 14.7 without EW is kinda sad

1 Like

I hope Gaijin does it. This could help China develop a new and improved “line logic.”

Pakistani – Taiwanese — Multifunction / Light — Naval – Air Superiority

J-10CE — Pakistani Line
F-CK / F-16V — Taiwanese Line
J-10C → J-20 / J-35A — Light Multifunction Line
JH-7A2 → J-15T → J-35 — Naval Line
J-11B → J-16 → J-20 — Air Superiority Line

Nah it sorta makes sense tbh.
The J-16 is a twin seater, I guess it sorta gives more strike-fighter vibes than the J-15T. Doesn’t change a lot though

I agree.J-16 behind Jh7a2 is Unreasonable.

“I do not have JH-7A2” the thread.

9 Likes

No, the J16 was the direct replacement for the JH7 so it makes sense where it is

I am wrong

2 Likes

isnt the JH7 made almost only for the Chinese Marine Force? If im not mistaken the air force dropped the program because the delays

It does.

1 Like

the engine delay causes the PLAAF dropping the program, but the rest of the plane were nearly done. and finnally the PLAN bought some of it to keep program alive. tbh the JH7 was born out-of-date

1 Like

Truly a no brainer to swap them.
I don’t get why the J-16, a superiority fighter, it’s at the top of the strike/navy line.