In short, what does it mean? Performance improvement?
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
It not only that we have have hard proofs, but that Snail actively refuse to take them, opting out on their own stuff. Honestly, at this point, thats the point of bugreporting if Snail can make a U-turn and claim that they prefer/believe their own source or claim that your source is “marketing pitch”
Edit: Holy sh*t, I did not saw the post below
3 Likes
the take-off weight became 95 tons
They also increased the thrust of the engine, although it is already too high
You can’t post this shit the same day i have analytical mechanics exam lol, now i want to test everything but need to relax until this afternoon lol.
Still looking at the changes this stuff looks REALLY promising!
2 Likes
The Oswald coefficient is still too low
2 Likes
Dunno, maybe it is some set mass used when spawning a unit or on a statcard.
I don’t know that much about their FMs, but I think (guess) this value does not really do that much.
I think "FlapsPolar0" is the wing with no flaps deployed (again, I might misremember smth), and "OswaldsEfficencyNumber" represents how much drag the wing produces for a given amount life. The higher the value the lower produced drag (more efficient wing, i.e., less speed bleed). @Giovanex05 can explain it better than me (or you can just read the wiki for Oswald’s Efficiency Number). Here the value went up, so it should bleed a bit less energy.
"ThrustMax0" I think is the base max thrust value. This is then multiplied by coefficients to determine the thrust based on alt, speed, and other parameters. So the base thrust went up a bit (for the SM).
"ThustMult" is in "Mode5" section is for "Throttle": 1.1" (thrust at 110% - afterburner). So a bit higher thrust on afterburner.
1 Like
Oswald in game is not actual oswald you would calculate (besides actual oswald coefficient completely changes with AoA).
0.7 increase in game files is huge. Feels like they either deactivated the Su-27’s automatic flaps and/or probably matched it for sustained turn rates in the 27sk manual indtead of the other one
1 Like
Bro, I have a Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line and Fourier Analysis in like 26 hours. Hardest offering of this course by my current prof and I have like 30% of the course left to learn. I am boned, yet here I am
Do you think this they tried to give it the series 42 thrust?
It sounds great. So Su-27 wont be finally brick?
Perhaps, but the 42 series has only increased afterburner thrust
Anybody know what "AnglesMultiplierPitch2DXX" are? These are not Instructor values, right?
Tup, basically Oswlad in real life is (multiplied by constants) a numbers that gives you the drag when you have the lift (or vice versa).
Oswald is ideally constant but in practice varies a lot with AoA.
In game files Oswald is by far the most influential value for drag and lift relation although it isn’t the only one, precisely because the actual lift and drag ratio is not a single value.
Also yes flaps polar 0 is the wing polar without flaps deployed… since other polars didn’t not change that’s why i’m somewhat guessing is something about automatic flaps getting removed
Fourier analysis is nuts (will have an exam including it next year, i’ve just seen applications of it for now) lol, good luck mate!
In changelog of new update are new engines for SM and improved turn rate.
1 Like
I don’t know, but I think they may be instructor values. Last time I did some testing manually editing flight models momentums are determined by the “arm” section for wings, fuselage, elevators etc that is distance of that force from center of mass
Shouldn’t it become SM3 then?
Not really. Only late SM.
No, from what I gather, a lot of 27SMs were given newer engines with a bit higher thrust, just like Su-34s.
