In theory large CMs can be swapped to smaller ones in a couple of planes, and considering their large CMs are compatible smaller ones too should be compatible, but we never saw them IRL.
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
1 Like
Appreciate the correction, and I’m still excited!
well, the MiG-23 could do it, but only that the MiG-23 has a large wing sweep that gives less drag, they are similar to missiles in their own way
o, it didn’t appear anymore
1 Like
FAB-500-M62T
T-thermostable
This bomb was designed to fly at high speeds and be dropped from the MiG-25
What is the afterburning thrust of the AL-31F on the Su-27 ingame, non-static?
I want to see the channel loss out of curiosity.
Damn, unfortunate.
And seeing as Gaijin hasn’t added any EW equipment I doubt the Su-30SM will get it’s EW Pods
thats got less of a wingsweep than the rafale and typhoon though
It has been well established the performance of the Su-27 is complete fiction in the game. It severely underperforms in regards to the FM and the channel losses are entirely wrong as well. Yet people claim the devs are biased towards Russia.
4 Likes
And what’s even worse, bug report on Russian was declined because “no additional reliable literature”
Su-34 NVO in files? Or only modification?
It’s current Su-34 iirc
Was it reported?
1 Like
Ah… I thought we had the first version in the game
Idk about previously, but today Russian bug report team just rejected it because “no evidence”
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/isowpfGgtkPg
I’m reporting everything here
I’ve heard it’s only 2-3% or something ingame. I don’t know why Gaijin just doesn’t do anything about it.
Because devs made the FM based on some papers about T10 from 1982, not Su-27(S) or even T10S.
And our community at Russian forum and bug report system can’t convince them that they are wrong because they literally made Su-27 prototype.
Also, they are rejecting flight usage book because it contains “some inconsistencies”.