It has L-150 too
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
Yeah, I don’t expect it to be higher than 13.0 in BR.
That seems unlikely
I’m not well-versed on Russian Flankers, but I think that is a later modernization. It depends on if Gaijin will be generous enough to give it L-150.
It does not has SPO-15 antennas on intakes, but has L-150 antennas on slats.
From the outside, looks more like no RWR at all. And I can’t find a picture of an Su-33 cockpit with even a display for one.
Damn. It will be useless.
1 Like
It definitely doesn’t look like SPO-15 indicator
Doesn’t look like any soviet/russian cockpit indicator I’ve ever seen before. Any more information on that?
I didn’t explored that topic further.
None- it will be at 13.0 after the Yak-141, as well as the F-14B at 13.0…
Im still betting it will be a premium/squadron plane.
1 Like
Ground RB 🤮
At first, there was about such an option with the output of information to the IPV (it was developed simultaneously with the option for the Su-25T/ TM).
Further here…(it looks more like TEWS).Реестр Су-33 - Страница 77
There are also more recent upgrades…
1 Like
Interesting, thanks
1 Like
So, wait, does this means that Yak-141 can have it RWR displayed in the cockpit through it IPV?
That’s exactly what I said?
Compared to the 27? None. The Su-33 can carry 12 missiles thanks to its root pylons, though that would be undermined since the Su-27SM recently received an extra 2 R-77s.
The Su-27SM2 and beyond have these extra pylons, and with the duel loads between the nacelles it would be able to carry 14 missiles.
Compared to the normal Su-27 though, it does have an extra 2 missiles. Both the Su-27M (if added) and Su-33 have the rare chance to use R-27E[A/M]s, though the Su-33 would be no different apart from its airframe changes.
3 Likes
Su-27SM2 does not exist. There are SM and SM3. They can’t use twin pylons. It’s pure gaijin fiction
3 Likes