Hi, little misunderstod here.
Devs used a 18920kg clean configuration to compare it to a 18920kg clean configuration:
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
1 Like
The Flanker skins have been a special kind of delicious (chef’s kiss)
1 Like
clean or not clean?
did you see the ukrainian flanker? I used it on the devserver cuz i love digital camos lmao
1 Like
gaijin could have given better camouflages for the flanker, there are so many that are incredible
some camos that for me are amazing lol
3 Likes
the graphs from that document should still be for an aircraft with 2 R-73 and 2 R-27
1 Like
mmh and this?
thats from the same document so same applies
also gonna note this graph seems to be in TAS not IAS like the Su-27SK manual
Well, the dev compared clean with this two graphs from what I can understand.
So check the document in deep if the graphs really use the missile loadouts and if they match with current su-27 performance.
Also, maybe check with 18920kg with the missiles.
the 18920 figure comes from this
Spoiler
and the missiles stuff is part of this chapter
https://streamable.com/0b6jf8 600kph - 18.7deg/s (20 from dev) 5.9G (6.3 from dev) https://streamable.com/qh7k4i 700kph - 18.9deg/s (20 from dev) 6.9G (7.3G from dev) Community Bug Reporting System *this is using the dev tools to set 2500KG of fuel
3 Likes
thats funny because for the 600kph speed and almost 700kph thats right on the money…
for the Su-27SK manual (heavier plane) with 2 R-73 and R-27R… its possible devs have configured the Su-27S using the SK manual as a basis, even if devs assume SK manual graphs are actually for a Su-27S still fails to account for mass of R-73s and R-27s given
I did! but I did not DL it because I thought it looked to fresh. I like a little wear in the paint.
I love the camo. I am gonna dl it rn.
Also very close
I know!
I have the bottom one from live. Is the other two available? That top one…
1 Like
this graph is for TAS not IAS, so its a bit off
1 Like
but for 200m? very close