Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection

Electromagnetic attack by the deep state! ! !

1 Like

More like “it’s in video games so it must be true!”

You’re better off learning basic physics than fighter manuals.
The diameter of a circle with a radius of 5 cm is 10 cm.
In your words, the MIG-29 cannot capture the target beyond 25 degrees! So what are you going to search?LMFAO

You guys think these ancient cassegrain radar dishes can move to the identical precision of a human beings head no matter how fast & slow it moves with 1970s technology & a radar dish that is VERFIED AS SCIENTIFIC FACT to be wildly imprecise & obsolete?

Tell me your entire education comes from video games without telling me your education comes from video games.

Su-27 N001 Mech
image

Mig-29 N019 Rubin
image

LMFAO

by his logic since the search pattern of a f4s is 120x8º it means that it cant aim more than 8º on the vertical

1 Like

image

Explain geniuses, how this radar and its reflector (the case) is pointing around as quickly as a human beings head can move in the nose of that radar.

My lord, the level of coping for overperformance is beyond real.

@Nowel you got any bright ideas how this radar is pointing around as it does in War Thunder with the IRST sight?

@ID_Heaven already post a manual for it… no need for me to explain it, it is already prove that it can, how they do it is irrelevant.

2 Likes

Agree. What he’s saying is something along the lines of it’s absolutely crazy for an AIM-54 to hit a fighter jet. When the conditions are right, it’s a reality. Then, we compare the maximum search range speed of F-16C and the speed of HMD. Hmm lol

No it’s just is more coping. the IRST can be used with IR missiles.

that is not the Su-27SK manual I have both.

It’s a paraphrasing and translation.

again 0 proof of your claims…

Says, you? Get wrecked.

What page you want? I got you.

show me how he is paraphrasing.

No.

Are you actually this uneducated? He literally is!!

The F-16C uses a planar array antenna, so does the Mig-29 SMT.

image

It’s literally the su27sk manual

image

5 Likes

Ignorance is you, right? Regardless of whether a flat antenna is used or not, time is required for the radar waves to actually become directional. oh,Is it SMT radar that can search in the 10 o’clock direction and then search in the 2 o’clock direction the next moment? amazing!

There is not a page listed silly goose. Nor does it say whatsoever that angular position equals R-27R & ER HMS capability.

Do you even know angular position means?

do you?

A flat antenna? Omg you are so ignorant & running entirely on emotion.

The Planar Array is an ARRAY of antennas. It has nothing to do with the shape LMFAO!

At least there’s only one silly goose.

what page so I can pull it? It literally does not say that radar weapons can be used to the same degree as the IR weapons. It’s an IRST system.

They cannot.

Are we done? I have better things to do? But before let me grab some more evidence that the Su-27 radar has no ability to point at the same exact range as the IRST can.