The Su-35 can be used thanks to a different airframe and increased space between the engines.
1 Like
1: i wasnt talking about ground, and i dont care about ground rb
when the su27sm first came out, it was fighting the f15c and it was struggling HARD to deal with that thing, later, it was fighting the RAFALE, EF AND F15E/I, and finally gaijin stopped usin the t10 prototype manual and fixed the su27 based on its actual manual, the double pylons also helped to fight the new top dogs, but the su27sm was never and still isnt the meta plane.
again i dont care about ground, go ask gaijin to remove the kh-38, it will make 0 difference in my life.
holy cope about a heli that has no thermals when today we have fnf missiles on helis that are 100% more annoying
cause other nations dont build systems like that, they use patriots or something else.(go ask gaijin to add them i dont care either, every cas in ground is annoying and they should all suffer)
4 Likes
What are the problems for non Su-35 airframes in that regard? Does the double 77 rack simply not fit, or are there problems / risks of hitting the airframe when the 77 is launched?
IIRC it also because only planes which actually did used double racks are Su-35 and 30SM2.
yea i get it , ig at this point they just want to focus more on balancing the game than making it realistic ? i mean they could skip straight to su35 instead of adding su30sm and it would have been much better. we already have modern rafales so i dont think it would have been an issue.
Dual racks barely fit between Su-35 intakes which has by my rough calculations I did about 15% wider space
imo it’s more unrealistic the EF sustain 16g+ in a turn than the double pylons D: but yeah, balance takes priority over realism sometimes
It is possible that there are restrictions on the modes…
Earlier, our people wrote that electronic scanning at angles greater than 40 degrees is ineffective. Apparently, new signal processing algorithms have appeared…
It is quite possible that in the mode of electronic-mechanical scanning, the angles are the same 40 +30…
I am simply shocked that this mistake was even made and has existed to this day. It is difficult to imagine a more negligent attitude towards one’s product, called realistic and even a simulator.
Su-35 is too strong.
there is a risk of impact on the body during launch
1 Like
MiG-35 is capable of mounting TVC engines and can be exported to customers in that configuration if they simply request it. But it is not default on the aircraft, and its not known what the poaition is with Gaijin on historically acceptable configurations that aren’t actually in active service.
They need money.But what I’ve already seen is a crappy FM and an equally crappy 3D model.
The point was Russia do not and never have suffered.
You may not care about ground…well thats where this Su-30 is going to be used. They even gave it KH-38s…with pylons it cannot equip
In-ground? seriously? M1 Abrams vs T-64?
Gaijin have never modeled G limits.
Stop singling out the Typhoon when every jet has egregious G limits.
Oh for an update then it was T-80 domination.
I hope gaijin just delete ground rb
3 Likes
It used to be fun but now its crap and it limits the capabilities of missiles.
ok? go and ask gaijin to remove the kh-38 then? again, i just want an amazing airfame (like eveyone has) for air rb, the kh-38 wont make any difference in my life, if you problem is with cas, go ask gaijin to add patriots or something else to counter that. (like i said once, any plane that can perfom cas is annoying and all of them should suffer, so go ask gaijin to do something about it)
typhon has the best fm in the game and currently is the only plane that can SUSTAIN 16+gs, before him it was the grippen but that was fixed.
3 Likes