± same like R-77-1 or much more?
Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection
Much more, r-77-1 is comparable to aim120a and b in terms of range
Ah okay. Than they dont need it.
Nah they don’t, but then there’s the issue regarding the r-77 maneiverability which is far better than the aim120. Idk If they’ll keep the 77-1
There is nothing between AIM-120A/B and AIM-120C5 what they can get?
Dark_claws tests from last time, though the charts are a bit cramped.
Though the missile is subject to change anyway
Like there is no big difference between them if I read it correctly.
Thats pish…Russia get hand held in ground and have the best CAS Russia has always been competitive.
Pleyers complain for consistency and equality.
Like why can the Su-27SM use pylons it never had for R-77s? But Typhoon cant use the double 120 pylons that were again never used.
Why is Russia allowed a KH-38 when other nations have to make do with SAL guided missiles or shorter range AGMs.
Why has Gaijin added the Ka-50 when no other nation has a sam that can shoot it down…
Why is Russia the only nation with a Pantsir level Sam?
1 Like
yea i wonder why. Let me Guess… One its the Best jet in the game ATM. and the other was being the worst for a whole year.
B- Balance
1 Like
the dual pylons for r77s are based on the dual pylons used by su35 , they already added the eft/rafale, they can go ahead and add the su35 , but ig they dont want to and they just want to balance the game by adding its loadout to a worse platform for the sake of balance. eft will probably get its dual pylons if it were used irl , none of the eurofighter variants use dual pylons for aim120/meteor irl , atleast the su35 can dual pylons for r77s irl.
Sure at the moment. So if the Su-30 becomes the best we can remove the double racks?
they may or may not remove dual pylons for r77 in the su30sm , its just the dev server and depending on how it performs they may remove it or let it stay.
Sure. Why not. Never being a fan of it. Remove everything and Fix the plane/Missile. Also add Su-35s.
The Su-35 can be used thanks to a different airframe and increased space between the engines.
1 Like
1: i wasnt talking about ground, and i dont care about ground rb
when the su27sm first came out, it was fighting the f15c and it was struggling HARD to deal with that thing, later, it was fighting the RAFALE, EF AND F15E/I, and finally gaijin stopped usin the t10 prototype manual and fixed the su27 based on its actual manual, the double pylons also helped to fight the new top dogs, but the su27sm was never and still isnt the meta plane.
again i dont care about ground, go ask gaijin to remove the kh-38, it will make 0 difference in my life.
holy cope about a heli that has no thermals when today we have fnf missiles on helis that are 100% more annoying
cause other nations dont build systems like that, they use patriots or something else.(go ask gaijin to add them i dont care either, every cas in ground is annoying and they should all suffer)
4 Likes
What are the problems for non Su-35 airframes in that regard? Does the double 77 rack simply not fit, or are there problems / risks of hitting the airframe when the 77 is launched?
IIRC it also because only planes which actually did used double racks are Su-35 and 30SM2.
yea i get it , ig at this point they just want to focus more on balancing the game than making it realistic ? i mean they could skip straight to su35 instead of adding su30sm and it would have been much better. we already have modern rafales so i dont think it would have been an issue.
Dual racks barely fit between Su-35 intakes which has by my rough calculations I did about 15% wider space