Дальность действия РЛПК в свободном пространстве и на фоне земли практически одинакова и зависит от высоты полета самолета, полусферы атаки и составляет по истребителям (σ = 3 м2):
а) при полете самолета на больших высотах:
− в ЗПС:
при атаке сверху вниз: Добн = 30 – 40 км;
Дзахв = 30 – 35 км;
при атаке снизу вверх: Добн = 50 – 55 км;
Дзахв = 45 – 50 км;
− в ППС: Добн = 80 – 100 км, Дзахв = 65 – 80 км;
б) при полете самолета на средних высотах (более 1000 м):
− в ППС: Добн = 80 – 100 км, Дзахв = 65 – 80 км;
− в ЗПС: Добн = 25 – 35 км, Дзахв = 25 – 30 км;
в) при полете самолета на малых высотах (200 м):
− в ППС: Добн = 35 – 40 км, Дзахв = 28 – 32 км;
− в ЗПС: Добн = 20 – 25 км, Дзахв = 18 – 20 км;
Source - Самолет Су-27СК. Руководство по летной эксплуатации. (Книга 1) -2004.rar (2.8 MB)
1 Like
SU-27 seems to be breaking its wings too easily in any kind of NEG G move.
Does anyone have any sources about the NEG G limits of SU-27?
I have never had any aircraft break wings this easily as SU-27 in mouse aim, maybe the A-6E TRAM.
And i only had 16 minutes of Fuel, less than half
I remember seeing a number like -6G in the Forums for SU-27 today or yesterday.
1 Like
You are 100% correct I am now breaking my wings in ways not possible at update drop.
They lowered the speed limit in which you can pull alpha (even full real) to 700km and weakened the wings to boot.
1 Like
At least the loss of my my right wingtip because of Negative G provided me this Epic Gamer moment
I bet the F-16 got very mad , rightly so lol
4 Likes
I am surprised the R73 did not spin out going vertical like it does often.
4 Likes
So, they reduced the speed at which you can perform regimes of 90° angles of attack, AKA Dynamic attainment/Supermaneuvrability. With this limitation the aircraft is already so slow that you Super/Deep stall and removes all tactical use out of it.
Dev server was at 900km and was perfect as it allowed you to still maintain lift and continue to control the aircraft (what supermaneuverable aircraft are supposed to do). Now post stall recovery has been drastically reduced with the new limitation.
Additionally, I have noticed the jet has a significantly reduced turn rate at transonic and supersonic flight and rips quite easily. the F-15 dominates the supersonic regime (as it should). However, the Flanker should dominate the transonic and subsonic regime. (as it should, but does not)
GJ has reduced the Flankers performance in the entire flight envelope especially its unique performance at transonic speeds.
The best fighter currently at transonic performance is the Gripen. It is the most stable aircraft I have ever flown and the best fighter in a phone booth knife fight. Especially with 732 flares on auto deploy. The Flanker has Zero advantage over the new fighters except R27s… Which at the moment is literally a coin toss with a bunk radar and you have to sit there, and baby sit each missile anyway leaving yourself exposed. Risk is not worth the reward.
5 Likes
same situation with mig-29, experimental 0.85 in game 0.63
1 Like
As for the Gripen. People want to cry about the F-16 being a UFO. I have never flown a fighter so stable at high speed, keeping the tightest circles ever as the Gripen. I can fly circles around multiple Fulcrums and Flankers and bleed them out of energy just like the F-16C and EVEN keep a tighter turn radius. It is literally an RC plane FM.
All I have to do is auto deploy my 732 CM and they are not hitting me whatsoever. 5 minutes of practically being immune to IR missiles.
I am not advocating any nerfs to the Gripen, but this reduction to the Su27 is completely uncalled for.
2 Likes
Yeah the only thing that is going for the Su27 is the missiles and the amount
its low speed needs to be better
3 Likes
Also, if they want to make the Flanker a pseudo F-14 Tomcat (do not agree) fine, give us the radar for it then.
2 Likes
Almost like very modern computer simulations, FBW and super high end aerodynamics can create extremely well performing aircraft.
You completely missed the point.
However, the Su27 is regarded as one of the most aerodynamically perfected designs, EVER. By USAF and Pentagon analyst.
So, the “super high end” aerodynamics statement falls flat I am afraid.
Additionally, the Flanker is equipped with FBW as well.
2 Likes
What exactly you feel that is missing or incorrect in the FM and how would it improve the SU-27 gameplay?
1 Like
Read the comments, bro. I do not understand how clearer I need to be.
Gaijin really does hate USSR aircraft lol, they don’t wanna give the flight performance
1 Like
By how much? How would it change the gameplay?
This ability allowed us to drastically reduce airspeed and maintain control of the aircraft with just enough airspeed to remain in the dogfight. High alpha reversals etc. Not fall from the sky as it does now.
It also allows us to drastically reduce closure rate and notch incoming radar guided missiles (Russian Doctrine).
We can no longer do any of that, thus further reducing our survivability.
2 Likes
There is no code in real life to type in Oswald efficiency , we are not living in matrix. So you calculate it by mathematics. So experimental is as real data as it can be. There is no code to datamine in real life
And in the papers I found from what I understood they calculate for the Su-27 that it should be 0.71-0.75. Gaijin can make it 0.71, doesn’t have to be 0.75, ideally they would make it 0.73.
3 Likes
