As it should be considering Su-37 was never adopted but lesson that was learned on it used on Su-35.
But doesnt change the fact that Su-37 was actually newer (first flight date) and proposed different things when it comes to flight performance(such as canards in that case).
All Su-27M had canarads. Su-37 (Su-27M2) isn’t something special. It’s just Su-27M with TVC engines that weren’t even installed on it for all of its life time.
Never said it was, where did you get that idea?
Are you sure about that claim? Cause last time i checked Su-37 was suppose to fitted with TVC.
“Su-37” is just one of 17 T-10M planes, when Su-37 crashed it had common AL-31F engines (TVC from it were removed in ~2001).
So it had TVC during its life time at some point.
As I said
Ok then seems like a misunderstood happened on that part, my bad.
Nice, now they just need to fix the detection range and the IRST will finally be usefull
Yep, can’t even front lock afterburning Gripen at 7-8 Km iirc
They also need to add some form of CM filtering, my IRST gets flared more often than the R-73 (huge achievement for the IRST)
Fixed Su-27 fuel tanks and ruined J-11 fuel tanks 🤦♂️
Hell yes. That’s huge.
I love that. It’s also actually giving you a bit more info since you can now see if the target locking you is lower / higher than you =)
We are so back
can the su-33 be equipped with r-77
no
I don’t know where to ask, so I’ll try here. The Su 27 is equipped with the Ekran system, can anyone compare the Ekran system with the BIT system on US aircraft? I think the difference is that Ekran can tell the pilot what to do and what to check, BIT just shows where the fault is.
Guess that didn’t make it to the live game?
Bit of shame, its a neat detail.
