Unfortunately it is what it is and nothing can be done about it, it’ll only get worse in that sense (missile spam). That’s why i prefer to not go beyond 90s tech, i find early 4th gen aicraft combat more interesting.
Unfortunately it also has to do with Airframe sizes. Do understand the likes of the F-15E and Su-27 family are heavy multiroles in the sense and this ofc mean they’re also massive, and being massive means more hard points and therefore pylons
There’s also the mig29m which would have a pretty good climb rate, radar and r77s, but judging how things are going yeah they might just add the SM2 and then the 35.
For the Eurofighter there’s always that proposed 14 Missile loadout that was shown in a render once. Gaijin could always fall back to that one if they feel it’s necessary
Thing i have read not specific for Flanker. Its that TVC should always being ON. the FCS should control what angle TVC use. And its usually a lot more beneficial to use both TVC and control surface. Than just control surface alone. So yea a TVC plane has Better ITR and STR than a non TVC plane.
Problem is it’s not official sources and as of yet no one has seen the pylons for it.
There is also kind of no need with missiles like Meteor having a high PK.