Not to mention IIRC Su-30SM doesnt even have RWR indication on DEV yet
1 Like
we still have blind spots on the su30sm rwr D: is that realistic at all for a 2013 plane?
@BBCRF do you have any sources for the su30sm rwr? Will we still have to deal with huge blind spots?
yep .The Airplane has no blind spots, this is just another stupidity by Gaijin
3 Likes
Do you guys know if the empty weight is correct as of now? (or if it should be lighter/heavier)
can you make a bug report about it? im kinda tired having to notch missiles based on my eyes only and not my rwr (cause every time i turn i can’t see on the RWR where the missile is exactly)
Its one of the heavy flankers. Even Bars its stupidly heavy at 650k vs Irbis that its around 450k.
no
1 Like
Not only that!..I don’t know where the Su-30SM is…
1.MiG-29SMT…
2.Su-27SM/SM3_Su-30MKK/Su-30MK2/Su-30M2…
- Video from the crash of the Su-30MK2 in 2912… Камера объективного контроля при крушении самолета Су-30. - смотреть онлайн в поиске Яндекса по Видео
why ? if you have good sources on the rwr, why not help improve the su30sm in wt? i dont get it
For starters, let them hire a decent 3d modeler and FM developer first
1 Like
normal? the top and bottom huge blind spots arent ‘nomal’ compared to the other 14.0 or even 13.7 rwrs, everytime you turn to -notch- you have to do that base on your eyes only, cause you are ‘blind’ on your rwr, thats why im asking if this is realistic and why we dont have 360 degree rwr
D: it isnt at the top and bottom of the plane…the rwr goes blind
and it’s not supposed to work as a sphere
Most likely someone drew data from the ceiling on a 360 degree sphere
Either RAFALE has antennas on the top and bottom of the hull
Are you saying Harrier’s aren’t in-game?
Even then, they don’t share thrust vectoring technologies. They are in no way comparable.
Is there a better source?