FAB-500-M62T
T-thermostable
This bomb was designed to fly at high speeds and be dropped from the MiG-25
What is the afterburning thrust of the AL-31F on the Su-27 ingame, non-static?
I want to see the channel loss out of curiosity.
Damn, unfortunate.
And seeing as Gaijin hasn’t added any EW equipment I doubt the Su-30SM will get it’s EW Pods
thats got less of a wingsweep than the rafale and typhoon though
It has been well established the performance of the Su-27 is complete fiction in the game. It severely underperforms in regards to the FM and the channel losses are entirely wrong as well. Yet people claim the devs are biased towards Russia.
4 Likes
And what’s even worse, bug report on Russian was declined because “no additional reliable literature”
Su-34 NVO in files? Or only modification?
It’s current Su-34 iirc
Was it reported?
1 Like
Ah… I thought we had the first version in the game
Idk about previously, but today Russian bug report team just rejected it because “no evidence”
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/isowpfGgtkPg
I’m reporting everything here
I’ve heard it’s only 2-3% or something ingame. I don’t know why Gaijin just doesn’t do anything about it.
Because devs made the FM based on some papers about T10 from 1982, not Su-27(S) or even T10S.
And our community at Russian forum and bug report system can’t convince them that they are wrong because they literally made Su-27 prototype.
Also, they are rejecting flight usage book because it contains “some inconsistencies”.
…
Why even?
Do they not realize T10 and Su-27S are far removed from each other?
It is like claiming J-35A will fly like FC-31, just to make an example.
It’s not like there is a lack of documentation for Su-27S in the first place.
Because they are believing that Flight usage book №10SK (about Su-27SK) is completely wrong and they are using book №10 (T10).
b-but russian bias
9 Likes
…
I have no words.
T10 is different in so many ways compared to Su-27S, it’s not even funny.
7 Likes
Idk how to convince them