I’m just saying there are conflicting information from different sources.
Brochure says 25300 @ 15.3m but the KnAAPO website says 25300 @ 14.7m
It’s possible that the brochure is specifying the max possible wingspan rather than the 25300 figure being at the said wingspan (I.e. with the jamming pods).
If you check the other links that I’ve posted, the UAC website also lists 25300 kg @ 14.7m
And for example in the Su-32 brochure, they specifically list the jamming pods along the missiles when they want to list the maximum speed:
The Su-35s Brochure its the oldest form of info we have on the plane. I know that with time they change and even started to state that these number are with Khibiny.
It don’t make sense for them to measure the plane with the Pod. Them remove and add the missile/fuel to found what was the gross weight. Specially when these Pod remove the posibility to use R-73 in the outer pilons.
If the plane in game will weight 19000 tons. Then the plane should come with the Khibiny pod by default. So far gaijin hasn’t add these pod for the aircraft in game that could use them. So the 19000tons figure its off. Same with RCS. The Aircraft is suppose to have RAM coating in some area. So the Su-35s should have smaller RCS in game than other Flankers. If not, the Weight should be also be lowered. RAM weight a lot.
No, technically it can carry up to 24 but it is only cleared for 12 officially until they finish current integration, testing, etc. Afaik the currently in-service F-15EX’s have not been equipped with the CFT’s required to mount additional missiles.
Sounds right, but we will see what it ends up being cleared with ultimately. Technically I think the F-22 can carry up to 22 missiles as well if it feels like mounting the quad racks.
And not taking into account that the FP variant could have more advanced and more expensive weight reduction techniques applied to its design and construction to compensate for the longer length and additional thrust vectoring stuff.
