Multiengine control is still broken
Model still needs fixing
Radar still displays wrong search zone values (only a text problem)
3D texture is rough
Su-33 looks cleaner than it for christ sake
2 Likes
A condition slider for planes would be great
1 Like
Speaking of Su-33 …
Bug report:
Su-33 incorrect max speed and max altitude:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/606CIuzgHdQz
Su-33 incorrect fuel amount:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/azEKTUgcU7pH
1 Like
Bug report:
Su-34 incorrect number of R-77 missiles:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/5fl9TZtSNemK
1 Like
I remember at the beginning gaijin showed it with 10 r77 lol
This report was closed with note “This information is outdated”.
The source is a snapshot of Sukhoi’s website from 2022-03-07.
And given that it’s from the manufacturer, it’s a primary source.
Can you please mention what is the more up-to-date primary source that you are using?
Is there perhaps a picture of the aircraft showing eight R-77 missiles?
Or is this infographic by “Sputnik” by any chance the source?
If that’s the case this is not a proper source, since:
1- It’s a secondary source, and even worse, if you look at the bottom, the information is sourced from websites such as “newsweek.com”.
2- It’s from 2015.
3- It has obvious errors (Look at which pylons the R-77 missiles occupy in the chart).
4- It provides the old fake number for maximum speed.
5- It shows the fictional rear-facing radar.
Do you have another primary source, more up-to-date and credible than the 2022 snapshot of the Sukhoi website? Perhaps a picture?
6 Likes
They have their own source, i hope they dont use websites of the manifactor , as the Infos given in those are generic, not specific enough, like in the regards of the performance data, but using logic,
I can see the 8 R-77 being, of the pylons are already present if not, then no, It isn’t a posssible config.
Watch them remove the 2 extra R-77 on underwing pylons of Su-34 and then slap them between engines
Interesting that they marked that one report specifically as outdated while ignoring the other reports. Seems there may actually be newer sources/information proving the report wrong while they didn’t have any evidence for your other reports to be wrong.
1 Like
Unfortunately they changed the website so it doesn’t even show who closed the report …
I really hope that they do in fact have an actual source.
If they say their source is the Sputnik infographic it will be hilarious …
What is the source of this image?
@_Fantom2451 @BBCRF @ID_Heaven Are the red ones supposed to be inert?
I’m assuming they inferred that if R-27s can be mounted underneath the engine nacelles then R-77s can too.
Though the issue remains:
There are only six radar guided air to air missiles in the picture.
FCS might be limited to six R-77s or six radar guided missiles …
1 Like
Forum army
1 Like
Inert
1 Like
Do you know why in that picture the R-27ER seeker head is a flat cone and not curved?
5:25
Oh, it is a P then. Are there any in service or is it just advertisement fluff?
Because inert