In your video, the capture works freely as long as you don’t go outside the angles of the Shkval (veer heavily to the side).
I can suggest to the developers to make it so that the TGP capture does not reset when the radar is on if you go outside the TGP angles
Yes, that was the issue I was addressing and I personally think it’d be nice if the targeting didn’t reset to the TWS outside of the shkval (or whatever TGP) angle, or it was much less forceful.
As CAS, you do pull a lot of evasive maneuvers that forces you to lose track lock, so I was a bit shocked when I found out that your lock doesn’t stay in place because it prioritizes slaving to the TWS radar.
But again, you and other users have made it clear that it was a feature that was already present in the live game so it is what it is until the devs decide to change or refine it.
I think it should work that way, since without radar lock your stabilization doesn’t reset when you turn away from the target
I’ll report on this, as well as a couple of interface flaws in this mode that I’ve noticed (no square around the target accompanied by TGP while you have a radar lock)
Rejoice!
You should have just watched the video and then you would have seen the su30 climbing while having no speed and it’s nose pointed up
… It is almost like I posted that video for a reason
From what i have read they have advance a lot in GaAs and GaN. But even Byelka need a upgrade to GaN. By StealthFlanker calculations Byelka its as powerful as IRBIS (not a bad thing). But its a 13yo radar/tech. They are also researching ROFAR radars. But there is almost 0 new info on that.
Dunno how feel about this. With Su-30sm not been the best climber or R-77 state.
@unluckyg another one for the list ^^
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/QFcgbpNx5zls
Basic math. You take the thrust and divide it by the mass of the plane. Boom. Thrust to weight ratio.
it seems your understanding of physics is too poor to be making such claims from just a video
The enlighten me all knowing physics professor how does the su-30 climb there if not for a twr of 1
How does it generate lift at zero airspeed oh great professor
And ontop of that more lift while drag
the aircraft is clearly not at complete zero airspeed
the Su-30SM received no engine upgrade while being heavier than the base Su-27 model, a plane that doesn’t achieve a 1:1 TWR on full fuel loads in the first place
you trying to use this video to prove an even heavier aircraft that generates the same thrust should somehow have a higher TWR just makes you appear an imbecile
MB it is at 10 kph IAS surely it will generate enough lift at that speed
While having nearly 90 degrees of aoa
You do realize they dont use full tanks nor missiles on those shows right?
With min fuel Su-30 can do those kind of stuffs easily.
provide any source for this magic thrust increase on the Su-30SM
So now you want a source because you can’t prove my wrong?
Whatever like ppl have said multiple times the su30 uses a different fuel which makes the afterburner burn blue.
Different fuel equals different energy density.
Different energy density equals different amounts of thrust.
It is kinda funny calling me an idiot and now asking for classified information.
smh
Lifting force
The Su-30 implements large angles of attack and high lift due to the TVС and canards
Fuel reserve for the airshow is 5200kg
