IIRC it also because only planes which actually did used double racks are Su-35 and 30SM2.
yea i get it , ig at this point they just want to focus more on balancing the game than making it realistic ? i mean they could skip straight to su35 instead of adding su30sm and it would have been much better. we already have modern rafales so i dont think it would have been an issue.
Dual racks barely fit between Su-35 intakes which has by my rough calculations I did about 15% wider space
imo it’s more unrealistic the EF sustain 16g+ in a turn than the double pylons D: but yeah, balance takes priority over realism sometimes
It is possible that there are restrictions on the modes…
Earlier, our people wrote that electronic scanning at angles greater than 40 degrees is ineffective. Apparently, new signal processing algorithms have appeared…
It is quite possible that in the mode of electronic-mechanical scanning, the angles are the same 40 +30…
I am simply shocked that this mistake was even made and has existed to this day. It is difficult to imagine a more negligent attitude towards one’s product, called realistic and even a simulator.
Su-35 is too strong.
there is a risk of impact on the body during launch
1 Like
MiG-35 is capable of mounting TVC engines and can be exported to customers in that configuration if they simply request it. But it is not default on the aircraft, and its not known what the poaition is with Gaijin on historically acceptable configurations that aren’t actually in active service.
They need money.But what I’ve already seen is a crappy FM and an equally crappy 3D model.
The point was Russia do not and never have suffered.
You may not care about ground…well thats where this Su-30 is going to be used. They even gave it KH-38s…with pylons it cannot equip
In-ground? seriously? M1 Abrams vs T-64?
Gaijin have never modeled G limits.
Stop singling out the Typhoon when every jet has egregious G limits.
Oh for an update then it was T-80 domination.
I hope gaijin just delete ground rb
3 Likes
It used to be fun but now its crap and it limits the capabilities of missiles.
ok? go and ask gaijin to remove the kh-38 then? again, i just want an amazing airfame (like eveyone has) for air rb, the kh-38 wont make any difference in my life, if you problem is with cas, go ask gaijin to add patriots or something else to counter that. (like i said once, any plane that can perfom cas is annoying and all of them should suffer, so go ask gaijin to do something about it)
typhon has the best fm in the game and currently is the only plane that can SUSTAIN 16+gs, before him it was the grippen but that was fixed.
3 Likes
Primary problem of ground RB is in my opinion that there are too small maps. There is no room to disperse anti-aircraft systems, so they are all piled up in a known location where they are an easy target
su-27sm ingame basically transformed into sm3, they just didn’t put the 3 after the SM and gave double pylon instead of putting r77s on the wingtip. I’m 100% against it because 1-it didn’t change shit in terms of winrate and 2-it’s really ahistorical, but it’s not that deep tbh, there are many worse instances in terms of balance (r27er vs aim7m, little f16 ufo which wasn’t fixed to this day etc)
3 Likes
Yeah I agree. That double pylons dont do much. They can easily remove them.