And what’s even worse, bug report on Russian was declined because “no additional reliable literature”
Su-34 NVO in files? Or only modification?
It’s current Su-34 iirc
Was it reported?
1 Like
Ah… I thought we had the first version in the game
Idk about previously, but today Russian bug report team just rejected it because “no evidence”
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/isowpfGgtkPg
I’m reporting everything here
I’ve heard it’s only 2-3% or something ingame. I don’t know why Gaijin just doesn’t do anything about it.
Because devs made the FM based on some papers about T10 from 1982, not Su-27(S) or even T10S.
And our community at Russian forum and bug report system can’t convince them that they are wrong because they literally made Su-27 prototype.
Also, they are rejecting flight usage book because it contains “some inconsistencies”.
…
Why even?
Do they not realize T10 and Su-27S are far removed from each other?
It is like claiming J-35A will fly like FC-31, just to make an example.
It’s not like there is a lack of documentation for Su-27S in the first place.
Because they are believing that Flight usage book №10SK (about Su-27SK) is completely wrong and they are using book №10 (T10).
b-but russian bias
9 Likes
…
I have no words.
T10 is different in so many ways compared to Su-27S, it’s not even funny.
7 Likes
Idk how to convince them
FAB-500T UMPK has TV guidance?
Maybe tell them to open their eyes if they think that they’ll fly even remotely similar to each other?
6 Likes
No. I was just corrected. It’s a high speed release point variant. You can go like mach 2 when dropping it. I assumed the T was TV, but it was not.
1 Like
They see some inconsistencies in flight usage manual book №10SK and preferring learning papers that is based on flight usage manual №10 because “it more convincing” and “some numbers just doesn’t make it” in №10SK.
5 Likes
What kind of inconsistencies do they claim?
This would explain so much about why the first Flanker feels so jerky. If they’re insisting on information that’s meant to explain the T-10, not the Su-27, then we’re totally off on what they’re using.
LERX’s basically don’t exist at that point, vertical stabilizers are wrong. Pretty sure powerplant is wrong too.
4 Likes