I don’t like one-sided strong statements, maybe that’s why. I like to say A and B, not just the benefits.
I don’t have Su 27 in WT, I honestly don’t think it will be better than DCS.
But I’m commenting on reality and this forum is not just about the game, then maybe half the posts here wouldn’t be about reality. right ?
It’s a narcisists deflection tactic, and not worth engaging.
That assumes the opponent started behind you and almost overshot, or that the flow went one circle in a very very slow merge. This simply doesn’t happen unless you make a very big mistake on the merge or the enemy accidentally messed up when given the opportunity to start offensive.
In any scenario, the enemy pilot (if competent) should hold the control zone sufficiently far behind you for guns, but not so close that you can force a scissors and subsequently an overshoot. I taught you this.
You say I’m scaring people away and preventing good discussion but every time you make such claims it feels like projection… this is why.
It’s funny tho
Does anyone have any idea how long that we’ll have to wait to get a flanker variant with competitive radar for top tier? Flying the 27SM is an exercise in frustration. It has missiles that only outperform opponents at closer ranges, but its radar set’s slow scan rates and inability to adjust search patterns makes it a pain to quickly acquire a lock amidst the 16v16 chaos. Meanwhile the opposition has twice the range on their ACM mode and just locks and clicks at you.
They will always be behind western radars if they continue to bring analogues. The MiG-29SMT radar is an exception to this.
No one definitively knows which flanker might come next.
By year of introduction yes, but if gaijin were balancing their BRs properly then planes at the same BR would have similar capabilities. Right now the SM is pretty much strictly worse than its so called “peers.”
SU27M/(Su35) or SU30MK would be it.
Edit:
Sorry, MKI is the Indian version
Whatever version with the N011M Bars radar
These things will be balanced over time, look at the F-5E and others. As more stuff is added to top tier the meta changes and more stuff fills BR’s.
The biggest problem is that they added planes that despite being from the early 2000s just take the old airframes (and also old avionics in the case of the su27sm) and modernise them giving some of the technologies that were planned on what should have been, had the ussr not fallen, the actual “F-15C and F-16C” for the VVS (aka MiG-29M and Su-27M).
Both the SMT and especially the Su-27SM are simply inferior designs, that are not remotely close to the best the engineering department could do but simply what money could buy.
This,
There are many variants of the Flanker yet to be added, with increasing levels of performance, weapons and technology.
There is also second generation fulcrums with 8 hardpoints (mig33/35/29k etc)
However, the tactics and strategies will now plateau without signficant changes to the core gameplay.
A few extra % in performance won’t change the way the game is being played, and new and more modern Flanker will be introduced alongside higher performing western aircraft such as the F18 variants and delta cannards
We are getting closer and closer to the end of the line for aircraft.
Who cares about DCS.
So, you are 40 year-old man who lurks around a video game forum does not play any of the vehicles mentioned & talks about DCS in which he does not play not either?
What are you really looking for here?
I am a little concerned, dude.
How am I narcissist when I mind my own business and you come out of your way to talk to me?
You only engage when I speak. Remember this.
It’s not worth engaging, then please by all means stop replying to my post that have nothing to do with you.
Avoid bvr against them at very long distances, like mig_23m said at that point ruskie planes will always be behind western planes bvr-wise
At medium range the r77 should work well
You’re right
Not necessarily always but the comparable airframes are generally inferior. There has to be a compromise somewhere.
It is underperforming quite a bit imo, but because it lofts when it shouldn’t to reach the current range.
I think the drag may be little exaggerated currently , but it is a chronic problem for russian missile variants until they ditc the grid fins and shrink the size of their radar and guidance package to make way for a larger motor.
You know how small the radar is in the R-77?
Russia does not know how do build large motors? They are the number one in rocket design btw :)
You know how big the R-27ER control unit is right? How much it weighs? About half the weight of an Aim-120. The Warhead? 39kg.
They obviously do have an issue making stronger motors. Obviously, they like the missiles & it performs optimal otherwise they would have upgraded them & “lose” the grid fins.
The engine is sufficient there.The rocket is very poorly modeled in WT
I feel like people intentionally make up design issues in Russian designs for no reason.
Now Russia does not know how to make rockets all of a sudden? Wild.
As of late you’ve repeatedly responded to me when I was talking to others and you’ve always stated some absurd nonsense. Of course you already knew that but I’m still letting you bait responses / attention rn.
I mean, it’s not a big concern. The missile is still worthwhile.
Ok, if you feel that way, for sure. I will not respond unless directly pinged by you. Do the same likewise?