I’m not talking about speed here. I’m talking about the load factors which 3000m curve tops at.
Apparently wasn’t humor as stated after all
The structural limit is a separate issue, as I’m trying to find out what the weight is in the turn rate graph. According the instructions from the manual, for weights other than 20000kg, this formula is used to account for different g-limits:
The limit for mach < 0.85 is 8g at 20000kg, so for a 8.5g subsonic limit, the weight is calculated as 8 * 20000 / /8.5 = 18824kg. It’s close to 18920 as indicated in the TsAGI report.
They said the graph is just copied from the Su27 and it still uses 9400kg of fuel. Maybe you should push for a bug report.
https://img-forum-wt-com.cdn.gaijin.net/original/3X/b/1/b1bd923f1dbf331f720bb82aad9ec83820c8630e.png
1 Like
They increased the Oswald efficiency anyways after that report.
This is an incorrect value, the second one I can’t report an error.
30min fuel in game it’s ≈ 7t fuel
Then there is the question of the F-15A…It also has 7 tons?. with a maximum capacity of 6 tons of internal tanks…or the engines are 50 percent more efficient…Our Russian ones, of course, have a higher specific fuel consumption…but not by 50%…
have a higher specific fuel consumption Only up to the AB mode, Then the Americans are worse
2 Likes
See you guys tonight!!!
5 Likes
F-15 has turn radius almost the same as Su-27 at low speed and more deg/s.
Su-27 have radar from Mig-29(9-13)
Soviet bias by the way…
7 Likes
I have the F15J but it seems to turn like a bus
All planes in WT have better turn rate performance especially at low speeds. It’s allow to perform Dogfight with a gun’s. Gajin go into more arcade style than simulation.
In this way Instructor in RB don’t get stupid and players don’t need to strictly keep speed or eye for not extended AoA
what does this mean? translate to peasant language for me please?
N001 now C/P from N019 with 1.5 changes
1 Like
It seems they adjusted the FM to reflect the aircraft with 102% throttle gradient so performance is now higher than expected from the 97.7% chart. Need to determine if this is realistic for continuous use or a MiG-21bis scenario.