yes
1 Like
sure thing i can be in the su27
not true, in a side aspect shot it has a good chance of hitting, the thing is that with the Su-27 currently you won’t get even close to a side aspect shot, not even if you turn as as hard as you can at first and cobra to do as fast as possible the last part of the turn
in a 1v1 in game it very hard with the su27 to get a good shot
that’s what I am saying
https://forum.warthunder.com/t/nerf-the-ja39-gripen-flight-model/73356/2424
@Panther2995 “Su-37” (Su-27M2) was just one of the Su-27M (T-10M, T-10M-11 in case of Su-37) (which export name was Su-35) that was tested with TVC engines, modern current Su-35S is overall better than Su-27M(2) both in flight perfomance and electronics. Modern Su-35 doesn’t have canards because it would be rudiment for it.
1 Like
As it should be considering Su-37 was never adopted but lesson that was learned on it used on Su-35.
But doesnt change the fact that Su-37 was actually newer (first flight date) and proposed different things when it comes to flight performance(such as canards in that case).
All Su-27M had canarads. Su-37 (Su-27M2) isn’t something special. It’s just Su-27M with TVC engines that weren’t even installed on it for all of its life time.
Never said it was, where did you get that idea?
Are you sure about that claim? Cause last time i checked Su-37 was suppose to fitted with TVC.
2 Likes
“Su-37” is just one of 17 T-10M planes, when Su-37 crashed it had common AL-31F engines (TVC from it were removed in ~2001).
So it had TVC during its life time at some point.
As I said
Ok then seems like a misunderstood happened on that part, my bad.
Nice, now they just need to fix the detection range and the IRST will finally be usefull
4 Likes
Yep, can’t even front lock afterburning Gripen at 7-8 Km iirc
1 Like
They also need to add some form of CM filtering, my IRST gets flared more often than the R-73 (huge achievement for the IRST)
Fixed Su-27 fuel tanks and ruined J-11 fuel tanks 🤦♂️
2 Likes
