Hm?
If you watch this video, a funny picture comes out, F-15,F-16 high-speed fighters, Su-27 small ones.However, in the game, the F-16 and F-15 also turned into low-speed fighters, which is completely absurd.Grippen does not understand UFOs, still does not tend to dive at large AoA,
Isn’t it too early to judge the Su-27, it’s literally not set up at all right now.
It should be a cut above at low speeds and keep up at medium speeds.
In other words, should flankers gain better maneuverability at low to medium speeds? Also, does that mean the F-15’s low-speed maneuverability is excessive?
The Su-27 should be much better at low speeds. Advantage over F-15 up to 5 degrees/s
Based on which source are you claiming this?
Thank you! Do you happen to know where this graph is coming from? Maybe you’ve send it earlier in the thread but then I’ve missed it :)
DCS
Bad example.
The Su-27 there configured completely incorrectly.
And F-15 overperfoming.
The game engine itself in DCS is also much worse.
Carefully read what is written
The physics of the engine is much better there
Can’t argue with that.
it’s my videos…
I’m seeing possible discussion that the FM is wrong, but I am not seeing in-game video testing parameters again from the manual … just random DCS graphs? Really?
Thought we knew better than to compare to DCS.
1 Like
Read more carefully what is written on the charts
There is nothing to read, what you post is complete nonsense to the average forum user. These graphs mean nothing if you aren’t going to explain and compare directly from the manual with side-by-side footage of how it performs in the game.
If you can’t elaborate what the issue is in English there is nothing to discuss.
2 Likes
These are the graphs from the manual superimposed on each other
1 Like