10 Likes
Please tell me what exactly in this garbage article proves the image to be wrong ?
Author is grasping at dead straws and jumping into conclusions out of pixel counting …
You have a lot to learn my friend if you believe that you can debate me with teenager blogpost tier of material for support to your arguments !
What are you supposed to be showing with this ?
Here take a look and tell me what you read :
Guess what you need to edit that again !
Its this IIR?. OLS-UEM. I don’t even know if the page is a good source. But at least have managed to get same info in other site. For what i know OLS-UEM (mig29/35)<OLS35<101KS-V(OLS-50M).
The info come from when Russia was trying to sell Mig35 to India.
In other hands the Armata thing its just people speculating. The only fact about what happens, its that the tank stop, a recovery vehicle try to pull the armata but it couldn’t. Then the tank Drive by itself. Stupid guys like Lazerpig (this guy its a joke a this point). try to make it like its worst thing ever happens. But a new tank with a new engine design, stopping or breaking down its not that rare. Even Abrams has problem early with it engine. Did people cope abrams is bad because engine broke like they did with T-14?
Pal, I’m pretty sure that’s for flight performance not stealth, after all you the f117 has some severe limitations when it comes to flight performance, if it loses power the pilot pretty much has to eject or crash, there’s maybe just maybe a 1-2% chance then can continue controlling the aircraft for any amount of time.
1 Like
The intake thing is specifically for stealth. It reduces performance
I wonder what an F-117 without electronic assists would fly like.
Downwards its basically impossible to fly the f117 without computer assistance, same with the b2
1 Like
Ok but clearly the computer can fly it, so there just be a way to do it manually even if you’re just keeping it straight.
Nope the computer really is what keeps the plane in the air because of the pure amount of tiny adjustments that need to be made to keep it in the air, its basically just constantly trimming the plane. (it makes something like a few thousand adjustments a second or something)
Wikipedia quote:
. It is aerodynamically unstable in all three aircraft principal axes and thus requires constant flight corrections via a fly-by-wire (FBW) flight system to maintain controlled flight.
2 Likes
Beyond limits of a person at that point. Level of precision in the controls is not possible with just human input.
1 Like
It was not bait, but perhaps you skimmed the other posts. It’s a lengthy thread, I don’t blame you. Anyhow, I was shooting for a contradiction/double standards argument.
2 Likes
Russia only spends around 48-56 billion USD for defense (whole military budget) a year compared to the US or China is probably why they don’t have the production capacity or capability
Maybe the US budget is so high because they pay 100k for a bag of bolts
2 Likes
And not like, you know, the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the economical shock therapy of the 90s did not happen
1 Like
su-57 is a multirole fighter, the f-35 is a multirole fighter, the f-22 is an air superiority fighter, air defense fighter is not a classification used nowadays because it can be misleading.
and i don’t know why you care about the role of the f-35 in this sense, as a multirole fighter it can do cap or cas regardless
so my question is, what is your point? and why did you ignore the eurofighter pirate irst also using IIR and the ability to track 500 targets at once.
and why did you link me a random russian article about the lrasm on the f-35 lmao
regardless heres your counterpart https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/su57-fighter-cruise-missiles-externally
su-35 being called an “air defense fighter” is also propaganda, clearly being used offensively.
- You do not know the full-time Russian aviation organization, the latest version of which came into effect in 2015 (nevertheless, you have added some kind of propaganda here)… 11-я гвардейская армия военно-воздушных сил и противовоздушной обороны — Википедия
- You do not know which regiments are primarily receiving the Su-27SM/Su-30/Su-35/Su-57…
a. For example, the 23rd IAP (the first to receive the Su-27SM/Su-35S/Su-57), located at the Dzemgi airfield near Komsomolsk-on-Amur,carries out air defense of the industrial area from Khabarovsk to Nikolaev-on-Amur and air defense of the Vostochny cosmodrome…
b.22 IAP (the second received the Su-27SM / Su-35S carries out air defense in the area of the Vladivostok naval base and industrial areas of Southern Primorye, including the factory where the Ka-52 is made… 22-й гвардейский истребительный авиационный полк (Россия) — Википедия
Вечерние полеты 22-го истребительного авиационного полка на аэродроме Центральная Угловая
3.Any fighter has long been able to use weapons against ground targets, including the Su-15TM …
For the F-22, it was planned to The F-22B strike and reconnaissance modification is being produced, however, the F-22A can also use JDAM and SDB…
- All Russian fighters have been focused on the export market since the early 1990s, so they adapt to multi-purpose tasks…
- In the Russian Air Force/VKS, they usually have a different specification…For example, the Su-30 was created as a long-range barging air defense fighter, and it performs this main role in the Russian VKS…
6.In 2023/2024, the Su-35S/Su-30SM were used against ground targets once in August 2024 during a breakthrough into the Kursk region…
2 Likes
There are a lot of so-called assistants from NATO countries on the other side of the front about the F-35 and so on, they are well aware of the real situation (even if the media starts saying the opposite), hence, as I have already written, the rethinking of the combat use of fighters, including the 5th generation … F-15E и F-15EX получат на вооружение ракеты AGM-158C LRASM
1.Using the example of Russian airline_for the F-35/Rafale/Typhoon ALS_ is only interested in information, the detection range IN THE FRONT HEMISPHERE AND A SNAPSHOT OF THE GENERATED IMAGE FOR THE PILOT!..
1 Like
This simulation is very strange, the Su-35 cannot have an RCS lower than the F-16