What problems will this create now?
Yes, the SU-39 will have a R-27 and a thermal imager, but it is located higher in the BR than the SU-25T, because they are different.
It’s not p2w, it’s just another plane
What problems will this create now?
Yes, the SU-39 will have a R-27 and a thermal imager, but it is located higher in the BR than the SU-25T, because they are different.
It’s not p2w, it’s just another plane
f14b is a tech tree vehicle someone needs to grind trough a whole tech tree until he gets their, that already makes it a completly different case and needs actual afford compared to using your wallet
You go into details. I’m talking general sense.
Well, let’s imagine that the F-14b is premium and the developer made it a copy of the F-14A.
And then he says: I’m not sure that we will ever make them different, because f-14b plays normally.
Those. you will never have a real f-14b
like i said i dont mind the thermal imager, just not the R 27 missles, it can get 4 r60m loadout no problem, anything else will make problems in GRB SIM and Arcade, you will destroy 3 game modes for 1
The presence of R-27 missiles is one of the main differences.
If it’s not possible, the plane shouldn’t have been added to the game at all.
If they decide to add a modification of the F-14, which differs only in armament, and do not give it, then this means that the entire aircraft should not appear.
and then it a balancing decision and all is good so?, many would be happy if they could get an f14 premium only for ARB
Actually no. Because the F-14B, which does not differ from the F-14A, is not the F-14B.
This is an insult to history.
I’m not talking about the full list of differences. I’m talking about the main ones.
Mirage 2000-5f, f-14b destroy everything in all 3 modes, while they are in the game.
Moreover, even with the presence of the R-27R, the su-39 is weaker than any of them.
it is a game, if you want historical accurary go play DCS
This is a desecration of history and designers, and a direct lie, because the plane does not live up to its name.
I can give you a Spitfire named A-10C, will you be happy?
I think you are just playing an arcade game with no understanding of the history of the technique, but the developers themselves have stated that they treat the game differently.
I play the game because I see cars here that are mostly true.
If, for balance reasons, the gun is taken away from the F-14B, will it be normal?
again difference between tech tree and a premium vehicle someone needs to put 0 afford towards
DСS is less accurate because they made Mercury a thermal imager.
This tells me that they do not understand what they are doing at all.
Em. Why can’t premium vehicles be the ones that aren’t in the main tree?
Is there an A-6E tram in the main tree? Turm3? A-10A also does not exist in the same form in the tree at 10.0
Premium vehicles should be balanced, but they may not be a copy.
If you enter su-39, then make it su-39 and give the corresponding BR
Really disappointing that Khod isn’t planned.
I think this is a good reason to think twice before supporting a developer.
He is not interested in historical accuracy. he can literally introduce a machine that does not have its basic qualities that distinguish it from the previous one
You can always rate 1 star in the premium package purchase window. So you express your attitude to such decisions.
The aircraft is very much the Su-39. It was never sold or advertised both in its blog or store page with the promise of any of these missiles being confirmed. As made clear in the blog, the Su-39 in game is intended to be the version offered for export.
Payloads and weaponry are always subject to balance decisions. Not purely what was historically used or available.
The aircraft is intended to be a premium ground strike aircraft. Again, it was never sold, advertised or promised to receive any of the things you mentioned above.
The Su-39 is a specially modified name for the Su-25TM (not the Su-25T), which was changed to indicate that the aircraft are very different.
The Su-39 has nothing to do with the Su-25T - these are not the same aircraft. Their capabilities for suspended weapons are very different.
If you’re interested, I can attach sources.
I’m talking about what he was created for in life.
The main difference between the Su-39 and the Su-25T is the ability to use medium-range missiles and the potential thermal imager and millimeter-wave radar, which were tested in 1991.
You brought an aircraft into the game without its main features in life, making it in fact a copy of an earlier su-25t.
The su-39 should have a higher BR than the su-25t, because this is an improved version with several differences.
An adequate solution now would be to add the Su-25TM, which would be after the Su-25T and add for the Su-25TM and Su-39 (because they are the same aircraft) the R-27R, a thermal imager and a millimeter radar.
Everyone is happy.
Su-39 - modified Su-25T, which was supposed to have new missiles and suspension systems.
As a result, we only saw a Kopye-25, but firstly, we don’t have a single missile for it (X-31, R-27, R-77), and secondly, a thermal imager and a millimetric radar were also being developed, which were tested in 1991 and could appear in the game.
I’m only talking about the fact that if the Su-39 was added to the game, which essentially differs from the Su-25T in hanging weapons and containers, then it should have them.
Add the Su-25TM to the game and change the Su-39 to get everything I talked about
Su-25T
Su-25TM or Su-39
As you can see there are significant differences. Su-25T carried R-73 on another pylon, did not have R-27, R-77 (РВВ-АЕ on picture), did not have Kh-31, Kh-35
In addition, the Su-39 had a modified Shkval-M, which allowed the use of the Kopye-25 radar, the Kinzhal radar, and the Khod thermal imager.
Su-25T could only use Mercury.