Stop saying that N plane is bad and circling around it like an eco chamber

what are you trying to say? it’s the same issue as if you placed an i15 at a 5.7 match. The Mk24 is very draggy and will not keep its speed linearly so if another spitfire (or re2005) dives on you later when you leveled for some seconds it’s going to catch up. I’ve never been killed by a Spitfire Mk24 and I face them a lot whenever i get into match with La-15 or when I started playing early jets like mig9l and yak 15. Not even when they were 6.7 and I occasionally met them in K-4.

1 Like

You original issue was that you’d been pounced on by something you couldn’t understand how they weren’t shown to you, nor kept up to you…

These are signs that someone is using the plane effectively, and player usage is a skill.

And is part of why people struggle facing some planes.

I came here only since i was looking for FR47 information, and search said, that that was the topic (well it was not, so thanks search engine)

I do not even remember most of what was in this topic, but i still remember one thing.

You decided to die on a hill called “stats card are accurate”

Time of response is irrelevant here, users will read this thread even after years if the end up here (and forum won’t get removed)

" A LOT of planes are misused by the users" - but ofc, more than 90% of the team in battle does not know what they are doing, half of them do not even knows basics.
But that won’t change the fact, that some planes are just mid or even bad at their battle ratings.

Plane is only 50% of the success, and there is no plane that would give full 50% but that is exactly why plane that is worth 20 - 10% at its BR is a struggle bus regardless of user skill.

Bad pilot will simply hate the plane, good pilot will get frustrated by all possibilities that he sees he missed and all that 'caused by “the plane”

Your opinion of “taking sides” from very beginning is also quite misplaced, i have no “friends” here, and i’m not the type of person to blindly take sides. Me standing in opposition to you (here) simply means you did not convinced me to take your side.

“I suggest you find another thread.” - this was only one that got matched with FR47, and i have no other business to waste time here, yes, i did not forgived them cancellation of decades of topics on old forum to be replaced by this garbage. My opinion, good, bad, agreed with or not, i do not care.

1 Like

Then why are you trying to bring it back up…

Literally did say that, but ALSO said that players MISINTERPRET those statcards ALL THE TIME

It shows more your problem, than anything to do with the topic.

That’s just teamblaming by extension… They don’t have to follow your lead, as you don’t need to follow thiers.

This is just nonsense…

These are both bad players blaming the plane to be honest. A bad tradesman blames their tools.

There are no sides in opinions bud… But you’re adamant I have to be ‘wrong’ by your perception, hence we’re back at this thread, months after it was finished.

You can find the old forum, it’s not that hard.

You don’t care, good, then don’t bump old topics merely looking for an argument.

I stand by my statements of user error, unreal expectations, misinterpreted stats and bad positioning.