The KE coefficient of the VT5 turret composite armor is only 0.14? Gaijin, do you mean that Chinese composite armor weighs about the same as steel, but its properties are inferior to aluminum?
14 Likes
not good,it should have better armor,even if in higher br.
it just like a bigger LT,and it is featureless now.
it could have been a light mbt,and considering it is a squadron vehicle,that may attract more players try this tank.
but gaijin just ctrl c+ctrl v,as always.
i don’t mean it is a fault,i just disappointted with this car.
3 Likes
light tank ×
light MBT √
2 Likes
aha So much evidence is put here, but refuse to accept it
2 Likes
This text has been polished and translated by Deepseek. If the tone or meaning is not fully conveyed, we kindly ask for your understanding.
We, the Chinese player community, have provided ample evidence to substantiate the issues we have raised, which warrant necessary revisions. However, to date, the development team and community management have yet to offer a direct or adequate response. Some of their replies have even been deemed disgraceful. After all, even in a vehicle simulation game that embraces creative freedom, there should be a baseline respect for reality. The current disregard for realism has led us to question the underlying reasons. Ultimately, many have concluded that this can only be attributed to racial discrimination.
6 Likes
The armor of the VT5 tank needs to be improved
1 Like
It needs to be fixed as soon as possible
1 Like
The problem is that vt5’ s frontal armor can be easily punctured by 12.7 or even 5.8mm strafe, even worse than Type 16 (it can partially resist 30mm). Is that air composite armor in the turret? ）)
4 Likes
Not yet, as of RN it is 80mm with less than 50 degree tilt, so not like with a 3.7 BR disadvantage, it will fend off anything. At angles, 30mm apfsds will pen as well, certainly 40 and 57 mm have 0 problem.
2 Likes
My main issue with it is the fact that composite screen has 0.15 effectiveness against kinetic rounds, meaning it literally is less effective that aluminium or even glass in game. Gaijin, time for some science class.
8 Likes
The VT5 is a tank with a weight close to T55. Although it has many auxiliary equipment, its protection should not be similar to that of 2S25m, as it is now,I hope gaijin can pay attention to this
3 Likes
At least half of the data on the VT5 is incorrect, including armor thickness, fuel tank capacity, shell penetration performance, and that inexplicably added ‘bathtub’.
1 Like
A tanks weight is not an automatic reflection of it’s protection capabilities unfortunately.
Naturally we will review and study any piblciallt available material submitted via reports, but we cannot make changes based solely on the tanks weight.
2 Likes
I hope developers will pay attention to this post,vt5’s data is currently wrong.
However,a tank of 33t can not Defeat 12.7 machine gun bullets On the front and side is clearly incorrect,i think gaijin should pay attention to this
1 Like
I think this photo shows the side armor’s thickness, it should be about 30mm
2 Likes
Perhaps the tank weight doesn’t accurately reflect the vehicle’s protection, but why would the Chinese be foolish enough to build a tank that can be damaged by a rifle, and why would Bangladesh be foolish enough to buy it? Does Gaijin really believe that releasing such a vehicle in the new version will actually attract players to play?
4 Likes
It’s too rediculous about a 33T “LMBT” cann’t even defeat 12.7 machine gun.VT-5 need to be fixed. I hope to see new changes on devserves.
2 Likes
slf-/ invent next gen air armor with 13t weight but 0 defense
1 Like