@yichenfu
I see you’re here to harass people trying to fix VT5 as well instead of being civil…
VT5’s armor is incorrect no matter how many times you attack us.
I get you hate VT5, I get you want to ruin VT5 in War Thunder, but that is no way to behave.
Keep claiming that it’s nonsense to say VT5’s armor is incorrect, keep demeaning the hundreds of people trying to fix the VT5; all you do is prove all of us correct.
Talking to you doesn’t require civility—you don’t deserve it. When engaged in a civilized debate, you’re incapable of responding, so you choose to ignore it. If you had stopped there, it might have been fine, but instead, you continue to spout nonsense. Your arguments are not only unworthy of refutation but also reveal a lack of basic common sense, which is utterly laughable.
You are just one among many who spread misinformation. Don’t act like an angel—you’re nothing but an ugly demon from hell. I’ll throw your words right back at you: no matter how many times you attack, I will stand firm and refute. It is you who are obfuscating the truth, not me. Wrong is wrong, and accurate is accurate. Don’t think your flapping lips can twist right and wrong.
@yichenfu
VT5’s armor is incorrect.
Keep claiming that VT5 is correct in War Thunder, keep claiming its perfect; all you do is post misinformation.
You’ve provided no evidence that VT5 in War Thunder is correct. NONE.
Yes, you are nothing but a machine that churns out errors, the biggest behind-the-scenes culprit ruining the game. Your arguments are nonexistent, and your so-called issues are pure fantasy.
Any rational person who has received a basic public education would know that this model is incorrect—it’s common sense, really. People have already provided armor data and photos proving the absence of a turret basket. What have you provided? All you do is ask others for proof. If you’re so convinced you’re right, then provide the data yourself.
Prove what? That this vehicle has a turret basket?
@yichenfu
Thank you for admitting I was correct.
It only took you many insults to admit that the VT5’s armor model and basket are incorrect.
So, what is your claim? Are you asserting that this vehicle doesn’t have a turret basket?
All evidence points to a rotating base that the crew relies on, but not a basket itself.
I’m also playing War Thunder right now.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
So, what’s the deal with the turret basket in the second round of testing?
What is your stance on the side armor being unable to withstand heavy machine gun fire?
I’ve seen no claims referencing range, nor full context to claims.
At 1km, 15mm will resist 50 caliber fire.
Have you not even visited the test server? During testing, the VT5’s side armor couldn’t even withstand 5.8mm bullets. After adding the turret basket, the .50 caliber shots were blocked by it. However, the VT5’s side armor should be capable of directly resisting such firepower without relying on a turret basket that doesn’t even exist in the first place.
Moreover, the VT5’s front hull has serious modeling errors—the fender and idler wheel are misaligned. How can you even discuss the accuracy of its frontal armor when the model itself is flawed? It’s downright laughable.
As a veteran Chinese tech tree player, I’ve witnessed the development team’s dismissive attitude toward the Chinese line over the years. This has compelled me to return to the forum, even though the update is scheduled to release today.
With all due respect, these are documents submitted by other players. If you, like us, are genuinely interested in addressing the objective issues with the VT5 in the game, we encourage you to seek supporting evidence as well, rather than simply criticizing the results of others’ efforts. :)