When I forget what I type:
why are you so attached to multi-vehicle systems, imo having a single vehicle is the better between the two, easier to hide and no delay on being able to fire missiles when you spawn
1 Like
The only thing its the ammo count, for example carrying only 8 missiles plus the box 16 total. When others like irist have 16 plus the ammo box.
I have basically completed the development of the entire land warfare tech tree, except for Israel. So I did forget about Israel. But putting aside the fact that Israel is the only particularly unique tech tree, what is the point of bringing Israel up? If Israel were in the same situation, would having one more victim change the nature of the matter? Would it prove that there is no differential treatment? Or is it to remind me that if Israel hasn’t received it, China doesn’t deserve it either? …
I think you can discuss this issue in the common discussion. Under the current circumstances, which option is better and whether there is any unfairness in the mechanism—I think you’ll get an answer.
Nah srry bro I was just mad bc israel not recieving anything good or new lately. I didnt ment for other nations to go down the bottom like us. You are right we should have at least multi vehicle like the rest.
im not looking for an answer from the whole community, just from you, and providing my opinion while im at it
Why are there complaints about China and Israel not receiving the distributed air defense they were supposed to get, rather than other countries complaining about not getting an integrated vehicle?
thats a fair point, but I dont think thats what complaints about the spyder are about really, its just missing most of its decent missiles and china just got stiched up with only the cs/sa5 till now