88kg?!? Even the improved 80’s HC didn’t have that much filler (though idk how it translates to tnteq)
At this rate if they add an HC for SS it’ll be more powerful than Mk23
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
Where they found this?
I suggest that the few of us who still play naval battles boycott the game until the Soviet ship is properly balanced.
3 Likes
Well
In msgs above there also “фугасность” - “explosiveness?” Maybe that could be pure value for tnt equivallent
Lol this explosion type was developed in 1940-1942 years.
How it can be in shell 1928 years??
And this question for Kron and more.
only 14 dec 1941 started testing a-xi-2
2 Likes
So the shell is from 1928?
If that’s true then yeah it shouldn’t be using A-IX-2 explosive type if there’s no documentation.
5 Likes
Yeah, and that’s a SAP round with over 600mm of pen at 1000m. Crazy stats on everything.
5 Likes
The test gun was used during siege of leningrad and new shells were manufactured during the war from what i read. So there would be acces A-IX-12 to put into the shells
3 Likes
This ship is just ridiculous. Adding ships that were never completed is the bar, I get that, but to make them the best ships in the game for their category? That’s just pernicious. The Kronstadt is already bad enough, but the Soyuz is just a blatant insult to naval players.
I was really looking forward to the update, but if the Soyuz is this good and the Roma is this bad (no concrete foam, unbearable RoF for the main guns) there really is no reason to do the naval side for me. I understand Gaijin’s desire for realism, but to hold ships that were built to the letter of the law, but then let ships that were never done be impossibly good is just a mockery of that.
6 Likes
Crap like this is what killed world of warships…
3 Likes
Insult to the history as well far as i can see to make it worse add this fake sht before British battleship one of navy superpower lol
4 Likes
Almost equal pen to Iowa, more explosive mass then Yamato, arguably better armor too since it can angle unlike Yamato and probably the smallest shell room and magazines on a top BB we have seen…
7 Likes
I hope this is dev only. I can count, and it’s not 300 shells.
Brother what? 😂
First ship I will grind and I’m gonna go on a damn crusade and only hunt fucking Scharnhorsts!
Making shit up about Russian vehicles, they always get a positive benefit without solid evidence, other vehicles will get a total nerf over rumors
Soyuz modeling of her ammunition rooms doesnt make sense. So much space between them and the turrets, with seemingly no way for shells to be prepared in a speedy fasion.
It looks more designed for War Thunders sense of damage modeling than anything a IRL ship would have.
4 Likes
You don’t play naval.
It’s cause they are Krons shell rooms/magazine and probably the same for the ammo elevators except the ammo elevators have been scaled up.
I’d give it a couple more dev updates before starting any serious complaining.
And before anyone else starts this wouldn’t be the first time something was put on dev essentially at the mid production point.
2 Likes
I’ve been boycotting it since they made arcade mode into a brainless mobile game. I was looking forward to these ships since naval was introduced. Not anymore. They can screw it up as much as they want.