If it’s like you said, let’s remove everyone from the game except Germany, the USA, french,the Soviet Union, Britain, Italy and Japan (lonly have their own vehicles). Korea and Turkey have more of their own vehicles than Israel.Forget everything else — Israel only has the Merkavas thanks to the United States.
2 Likes
That’s not my point at all. I’m not here to argue with you, just to debate.
My reasoning is thus: I don’t mind grinding through a vehicle a couple times in separate trees, but I don’t want to do it more than 2 or 3 times. If I want to play the T34-85, I can play Russia, China or Sweden. I don’t want another tech tree to come along down the line where I now have to research the T34-85, along with a load of other vehicles sharing this problem yet again. It’s getting excessive and it’s reducing my interest in grinding through new trees just to get to those totally unique vehicles in the highest ranks.
All I’m saying is that if Korea were to be introduced as suggested here, players who feel the way I do, and I know I’m not alone on this, for us it would be a massive detractor, and a bit of a death sentence for that content amongst this group of players. There are definitely more agreeable methods to implement this highly sought after content.
The easy solution is just to folder these vehicles behind more unique options outside of their nation of origin (or main operator for pure export vehicles).
This way they are only mandatory in one nation, and optional everywhere else for players that specifically want them for that nation or for a lineup.
That’s true, but that still requires a healthy supply of unique vehicles to populate the ranks below VI and VII. Not sure how a Korean tech tree would be able to accomplish that.
1 Like
This wasn’t specific to the Korean tree, but the game in general. Many existing trees could benefit a lot from this.
For Korea I believe the best solution is to make a combined Korean tree, where the unique designs from both South and North Korea are included, similar to how China or Germany are handled. I don’t think South Korea alone is enough.
5 Likes
I would like to see it in Japan tech tree. It could actually make it good. Just look at AIR there is not much. Thailand did not save it. Not to mention that Japanese vehicles are one trick pony. Fast - Fast autoloader - no armor. All of them. And thing is there is not much to add now in general.
1 Like
Japan js getting the ASEAN options, so if you want a gap filler for japan there’s plenty. Korea is not needed.
8 Likes
Plus South Korea was denied for Japan anyway.
7 Likes
yes
The ASEAN options in question: Swedish, Russian, American vehicles that can be easily pasted. South Korea would fill non-copypaste top tier options while making sense with alliances in the region to US/NATO. A united tree is a really terrible idea because they would never fight together in any realistic scenario.