quick reminder that back in the day gaijin also said that there will never be top tier premiums in the game, quit being delusional
1 Like
Problem with this is Thailand is already a confirmed and implemented subtree for Japan, yet you are still pushing it to Japan? And you tell me Im the delusional one lol
11 Likes
i don’t see any thai tanks in the ground tech tree, can you guess why? because they have nothing special to offer and soviet vehicles will never be implemented into japanese tech tree, even in a form of an sub tree
1 Like
Thats if you dont actually try to look at the Thai subtree suggestion, did you even look?
8 Likes
Top tier is often defined as the very top BR, like 14.0. There is no premium and there never was one that hit the maximum BR at its time. SK for Japan was denied more than enough times, and for obvious reasons
9 Likes
yeeeah right buddy
1 Like
When making a sub tree, gaijin has to consider the relationship between the main nation and the potential nation being added to the subtree.
Gaijin wont add SK to Japan, despite the fact that they are geographically close, because of Korea’s bloody history with Japan, and the fact that technologically, South Korea never based anything it produced off of Japanese technology. It’d make more sense for SK to go to USA, as they have close cultural, diplomatic, military and technological relationships.
However i believe that a United Korea Tech Tree would be more fitting for nations like South Korea and North Korea.
11 Likes
No. The only reason why subtrees exist is to bolster another tree that is close to running out of options. China doesn’t need a subtree, it has more than enough options.
May I introduce you to the Chinese TT. You already got F-16s and “Su-27s” in it. At some point, we’re gonna get the Abrams in it too.
If we’re going off of the political landscape to choose, SK very grudgingly maintains a cooperation with Japan. In case you didn’t know, Japan occupied Korea for 35 years, and let’s just say, that occupation makes modern day conflicts look peaceful.
Also, once again the PRC and ROC are both in the Chinese TT and they fought in a civil war for 14 years (plus a 9 year gap) and were “this” close to fighting again couple months ago. I would say, NK’s closest political ally is actually Russia, not China.
pretty sure Koreans hate Japan more, for reasons stated above. If they have to choose, I’m confident they would rather go with a United Korea TT
7 Likes
i don’t see any thai tanks in the ground tech tree, can you guess why?
That’s because the Thai Ground TT is not implemented yet, not because there some “conspiracy” to deny vehicles of “Soviet” origin to the Japanese TT. Oh btw the “Soviet” vehicles Thailand operated are overwhelmingly of Ukrainian origin NOT Soviet/Russian origin
A separate South Korean tree would just end up being a boring Israel 2.0.
Bad analogy. South Korea has way more unique vehicles even aircraft than Israel does that’s not a derivative of an existing vehicle
Also I would find this hilarious if it’s not also sad at the same time since the “SoUtH kOrEa ShOuLd Be A jApAnEsE sUb-TrEe” types try to use every flawed reasoning under the sun to justify it even if it’s regularly debunked while at the same time consistently dismissing ASEAN nations despite the fact that (some) ASEAN nations have way more justification to be a part of the Japanese TT as a subtree than SK ever would
13 Likes
Great work dude! I hope they use it!
I want a tech tree with both Koreas. The lower tiers can just be copy paste vehicles and the high tiers will have unique vehicles from both countries.
Germany got one
We all know that Gaijin only considers Russia and US as main line. Plus it would just “Bloat” the US line out when they have vehicles that can be added fill the gaps.
3 Likes
Goal post moving are we, Germany is just as big as the U.S. and Soviets.
1 Like
The only one that moves the goal post the one who own it.
Good way to put it lol
+1 for a dual Korea tree
2 Likes
+1 Hot take but I think if they don’t make a unified Korea tree it should go to Japan. No one seems to make a big fuss of Taiwan being in China, it would be ultimately harmless in the game. Especially when unlike the aforementioneds, they aren’t planning to go to war with each other. Both cooperate with NATO too.
No one makes a big fuss about the ROC and PRC being together because they both claim suzerainty over the other. If you ask ROC players, theyll demand the PRC be put with them similarly with PRC players.
If you ask ROK players about their inclusion into the Japan TT, its a near universal no. I for one also vote no. If you want a more in-depth look into this, pretty sure just scroll above and youll see an argument or two.
On that note, +1 still to the United Korea TT!
7 Likes
It is harmful and controversial.
There was a actual suggestion about ‘korea as a japan sub tree’ and it was a absolute mess, and in the end it got removed for various reasons.
And gaijin denied it few times, so it’s not happening.
9 Likes