oof its so hard to navigate when you have 5 answers throughout 500 messages.
Because gaijin want many techs with no effort. Thats why they need to be called out.
Oh believe me i DO understand what is happening, and calling it out is what i do.
Well you can tell it like that, but you do undestand what i ment by that?
ZiS, YAG, those are all very bad machines AND they are open-top cardboards with no turret. Yet they dont work even half as good as german Panzer IVs and STUGs.
Su-122, 152 on the other hand are a cool hipower cannons, but they are again a haubizes with (at least for su-122) garbage ballistics and HEAT that fails to oneshot Valentine, and SUPER long reload.
By hi-power cannons i ment the difference between the T-34 and PzIVs, and the stupidity of wanting to make each tree “balanced” simply by adding similar tanks
Which is to their gisgrace made the tech trees obsolete to the huge point. The entire idea of them were to make separate experiences, and to make players want to grind several trees instead of leaving the game after one tree. I dont understand how they keep ignoring that fact that they were huge fond of ealy days of production. What is the point of buying the premium tanks if you ought to grind the same techs?
Not that long, but seems like it. Now the only thing i can do is keep calling that out. Maybe, maybe day comes they decide to remove that copypaste garbage as they did with the “unhistorical” machines. Yeah… Right…
Calling it a copy-paste KWS is misleading considering the new MFD’s, UFCP, and armament. Though I guess if you only play realistic these differences are irrelevant.
Yes, those differences in the cockpit, one guy already told us about. They are obsolete to the 90% of the gameplay cycle, so i can hardly tell that this makes this plane not C&P. Also, curious, would those new cockpit attire be different from EJ KAI?
I don’t think I’ve ever seen the F-4EJ Kai’s cockpit, however the AUP features one MFCD with possibly good MFD pages considering that’s the part of Elbit Systems.
Other than that, HUD symbology should be different as it uses the Elbit Series 967 HUD, which provides a cleaner format compared to the usual analogue reticle of the base F-4 models.
TL;DR: It’s an upgrade, you get new stuff to mess around with and possibly increase utility.
The British tree shouldn’t get Leos, but since Australia became a subtree, it is only a matter of time until Gaijin gives in to the cries of the Canada fans and turns Canada into a subtree as well
Gotta have Britain become the most bloated tech tree ever
I missed Something or the “Greek” Vehicles in the ground tech tree are Just a Leopard 2 and a couple of Sam system? I mean, Israel Need more anti air but i was expecting something more
Yeah, EXACTLY, changes that AREN’T reflected in the game. We are discussing an INGAME object, not a real one, nobody is arguing about IRL. So yeah, it is stupid to bring up changes that are NOT reflected in the game.
Idk what logic you used, definitely not mine. T-90M has a completely brand new welded turret and hull(because of new integrated ERA).
2A6 HEL on the other hand LITERALY uses same everything as PLSS, except some VERY minor details.
