Light tank
1 Like
sweden doesnt even use DM53, so there you got your answer
honestly you are climbing fast in nonsensical thread poster ranking.
Think a bit more about what you actualy write and the topic instead of letting out every brain fart.
Look for existing topics were you could ask questions like one of the many sweden threads or cv threads instead of making a new one every time
1 Like
this is ur answer
I wouldn’t mind it at all honestly.
its the EXACT same mobility as the strv122. It has just a 2km higher top speed from the 122s 68 to its 70kmh . Its power to weight is also just 5 hp per ton more than the strv122 s 23hp per ton to to cv90120 28hp per ton. Basicaly no diffrence in mobility but you get an infinetly worse hull and turret. No armor and no spall liners
1 Like
5 HP/ton is actually a pretty significant difference.
Besides that, it’s a light tank. Most of the time you use it to scout and reduce SP for your planes. The CV90120 is one of the best top tier light tanks because of it’s firepower.
3 Likes
Tldr u have no actual idea how the game works
1 Like
In long range map i prefer it over Strv122 because LWS better zoom better thermal and better reload but it depends on Players you might see no reason to use it over Strv122 but I do (but well overall, I use 122 more often because such long-range map rarely exist)
So Swedish army still use Slpprj M95? as their best round?
f5c didnt have flare pods either. But here we are. The only diffrence is the cv90120 was designed to fire dm53 where as the f5c never had the pods equiped.
And famously nobody has ever complained about the f5c having flare pods
yep. They only care about innaccuracies they dont benefit from it
Yeah? M322 is quite literally the 2nd best APFSDS in the game, what issue is there with using it in an L/49?
Bro forget M829A1 and A2 exist
Not like it really matters, m/95 is a great round theres really no need for the cv90120 to get dm53 it wouldnt really change how it performa
You’re telling me that a thinner subpenetrator that weighs almost 0.7kg less, traveling 60m/s slower, and barely matching it in penetration is better?
I didn’t “forget” they exist, they simply suck in comparison.
A1 maybe but A2 have more pen (better than DM53 L/44 )
And there other two worth mention are
M338
Type 10
Both have better pen than M332 (both have 600+)
so no 332 really not second place
Pen means little to nothing when the primary driving factor of WT’s penetration calculator is mass degradation… Once again, 0.7kg heavier subpenetrator.
Once again, 0.6kg lighter.
Type 10? You’re joking, right? At that point you might as well argue in favor of the OTOMATIC.
Your perception of which shot is best is horridly skewed.
could the cv90120 theoreticaly carry the 120mm armor piercing freaky shell ?
What “freak shell”?
I mean this is a late reply but like cv90120 never entered service it doesnt really have a nation that operates it to use its shell. It was made to use standart nato shells so it should be using dm53 i think