Why not both? China needs more vehicles anyway
7 Likes
definitely not, this may cause some misleading.
It’s more like a paper product from a humble company, could be used to attract investment
Hence why I added a question mark there. As said at the very beginning, in big, bold text and in cyan; it is still rather unknown with specs
2 Likes
I really wish this plane had keept the original tail desing, it made it look super cool
klj7a likley to be for the export j35, local one is most likley using the klj5 or some derivative
Would be cool to see. Hopefully we will get a confirmation if she has a cannon as a last ditch weapon or not.
2 Likes
is this first fighter displayed with pl-12a?
I’m not sure if the one on that one J-10CE display was one, but if not, then yes
1 Like
also, have you found any image of a maws sensor on either j20 or j35?
Not sure about the J-35 due to scarce info, but the J-20 should have them around it
1 Like
do you have a pic/proof of it that you can post in the j-20 thread?
it is, the serial number contains P12AE
and there shouldn’t be any difficulty for any modern Chinese plane to use it.
2 Likes
5th gen plane uses EODAS, not normal MAWS, the dark windows on the aircraft envelope should be EODAS’s windows
surely fin size would make it unsuitable for internal carrige?
1 Like
that could be a problem, but J-35 also has wing hard point.
1 Like
The carrier-based version is named as J-35, with no additional suffix letters.
2 Likes
+1 temu f-22
1 Like
